Jonathan Ayala v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
| JONATHAN AYALA |
| SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA |
| 25-1430 |
| March 11, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Certified copy of duplicate notice of appeal filed in the district court on 03/07/2025 received from Clerk of District Court. (LMR) [Entered: 03/13/2025 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Helen Theresa Zygmont Glinski on behalf of Appellee(s) Supt. Houtzdale SCI; District Attorney Philadelphia; Attorney General Pennsylvania. [25-1430] (HZG) [Entered: 03/12/2025 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect., AND advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (SH) [Entered: 03/12/2025 01:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 03/11/2025 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (LMR) [Entered: 03/11/2025 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Jonathan Ayala in District Court No. 2:21-cv-04372. (LMR) [Entered: 03/11/2025 01:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
