In re: Dwight Campbell
| In re: DWIGHT CAMPBELL |
| OFFICERS OF THE LOGAN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, NICOLE GRIPP, MATTHEW LUTZ, TYLER MCCONNELL, JUSTIN HOLLERN, DESTINY CROSS, EMILY FREED, of F.S.I. Justice Project, PETER J. WEEKS, JESSICA WEIL, PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, KELCIE WEAVER, TOWNSHIP OF LOGAN and STEPHANIE L. HAINES |
| PTLM MATTHEW DUNIO |
| 25-1705 |
| April 15, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
CLERK LETTER SENT to Petitioner Dwight Campbell. [25-1330, 25-1705] (LMR) [Entered: 07/08/2025 02:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
Letter from Petitioner regarding the petitions docketed at Nos. 25-1330 and 25-1705. [25-1330, 25-1705] (LMR) [Entered: 07/08/2025 01:54 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion is denied as presented. The petition received from Petitioner and docketed at the above case number was titled Dwight Campbell Petition for writ of mandamus. A copy of the petition is enclosed for Petitioners information. The Courts decision denying the above-docketed petition for writ of mandamus was entered on May 8, 2025. If Petitioner would like to seek review of the Courts decision, he may file a petition for rehearing. If the time to seek rehearing has passed, a motion for leave to file the petition for rehearing out of time must also be filed. It is noted that Petitioner did file a petition for writ of prohibition in February, which was docketed at Case No. 25-1330. In that case, Petitioners motions to reopen and motion to proceed in forma pauperis are pending with the Court. The parties will be notified when a decision has been entered in that matter. (LMR) [Entered: 05/27/2025 10:03 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION filed by Petitioner Dwight Campbell titled to advise this Court of hearing wrong writ. (LMR) [Entered: 05/22/2025 02:43 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
PER CURIAM ORDER (BIBAS, PORTER and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Circuit Judges) denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Petitioner Dwight Campbell. Panel No.: ALD-142-E. (LMR) [Entered: 05/08/2025 10:56 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: BIBAS, PORTER and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 3. ALD-142-E (LMR) [Entered: 05/08/2025 10:55 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Dwight Campbell. (LMR) [Entered: 05/02/2025 02:52 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION filed by Petitioner Dwight Campbell to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (LMR) [Entered: 05/02/2025 02:49 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
NONCOMPLIANCE Order Action on the above-captioned petition for writ of mandamus is hereby deferred. Petitioner did not submit the docketing fee or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) with the mandamus petition. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either remit payment of the $600.00 docketing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit. Petitioner must also serve the petition on each party to the proceeding in the trial court (or on counsel for each party), and provide a copy of the petition for writ of mandamus to the District Court judge. Until the petition is brought into compliance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 21, the petition is deemed lodged with the Court and will not be submitted to the Court for a decision. (LMR) [Entered: 04/15/2025 02:34 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (LMR) [Entered: 04/15/2025 02:31 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner Dwight Campbell. (LMR) [Entered: 04/15/2025 02:29 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
