Raymond Rodriguez v. Loyal Source Government Services
| RAYMOND RODRIGUEZ |
| LOYAL SOURCE GOVERNMENT SERVICES |
| 25-1752 |
| April 21, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Civil Rights Employment |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Raymond Rodriguez v. Loyal Source Government Services |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER (Clerk) No action will be taken on the foregoing response. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 27(b), [t]imely opposition filed after the motion is granted in whole or in part does not constitute a request to reconsider, vacate or modify the disposition; a motion requesting that relief must be filed. The Clerks Order of September 4, 2025, will remain in effect. (AMR) [Entered: 09/08/2025 03:13 PM]
|
Filing 17
ORDER (CHUNG, Circuit Judge) The foregoing motion for extension of time to file brief and appendix is GRANTED. The Appellants brief and appendix are due November 3, 2025. Panel No.: DCO-148. CHUNG, Authoring Judge. (AMR) [Entered: 09/04/2025 03:20 PM]
|
| Filing 16 ECF FILER: RESPONSE on behalf of Appellee Loyal Source Government Services to Appellan't motion to revise briefing schedule. Certificate of Service dated 09/04/2025 by ECF. [25-1752] (RAJ) [Entered: 09/04/2025 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 15 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Raymond Rodriguez for Extension of Time to file Appellant Brief and Appendix until/for 60 days. Certificate of Service dated 09/03/2025. Service made by ECF, Email. [25-1752] (JAO) [Entered: 09/03/2025 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 14 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Joseph A. O'Brien on behalf of Appellant(s) Raymond Rodriguez. [25-1752] (JAO) [Entered: 09/03/2025 03:09 PM] |
Filing 13
ORDER (Clerk) No action will be taken on the foregoing reply. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 27(b), [t]imely opposition filed after the motion is granted in whole or in part does not constitute a request to reconsider, vacate or modify the disposition; a motion requesting that relief must be filed. The Clerks Order of June 9, 2025, will remain in effect. (AMR) [Entered: 06/17/2025 01:03 PM]
|
| Filing 12 Reply to Response by Appellant Raymond Rodriguez to Appellee Loyal Source Government Services in Opposition to Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time. Certificate of service dated 06/13/2025. Service made by ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 06/16/2025 11:53 AM] |
Filing 11
ORDER (CHUNG, Circuit Judge) The foregoing motion to extend time to file the Appellants brief and Appendix is GRANTED. The Appellants brief and appendix are due September 3, 2025. Panel No.: DCO-109. CHUNG, Authoring Judge. (AMR) [Entered: 06/09/2025 03:13 PM]
|
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: RESPONSE filed by Appellee Loyal Source Government Services in Opposition to Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time. Certificate of Service dated 06/05/2025 by US mail, ECF. [25-1752]--[Edited 06/06/2025 by CJG] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/05/2025 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Raymond Rodriguez for Extension of Time to File Brief and Appendix until/for 90 days. Response due on 06/16/2025. Certificate of Service dated 06/05/2025. Service made by Email. (AMR) [Entered: 06/05/2025 09:14 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (AMR) [Entered: 04/24/2025 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 7 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Raymond Rodriguez due on or before 06/03/2025. Appendix due on or before 06/03/2025. (AMR) [Entered: 04/24/2025 01:05 PM] |
| Filing 6 Notice received from district court that ifp has been granted to Appellant Raymond Rodriguez. (AMR) [Entered: 04/23/2025 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Loyal Source Government Services. [25-1752] (RAJ) [Entered: 04/22/2025 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Rufus A. Jennings on behalf of Appellee(s) Loyal Source Government Services. [25-1752] (RAJ) [Entered: 04/22/2025 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (AMR) [Entered: 04/21/2025 01:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 04/21/2025 01:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Raymond Rodriguez in District Court No. 3:22-cv-01362. (AMR) [Entered: 04/21/2025 01:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Raymond Rodriguez v. Loyal Source Government Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RAYMOND RODRIGUEZ | |
| Represented By: | Raymond Rodriguez |
| Represented By: | Joseph A. O'Brien Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LOYAL SOURCE GOVERNMENT SERVICES | |
| Represented By: | Rufus A. Jennings Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.