Derrick King v. The Soundcoat Co Inc, et al
| DERRICK MARTIN KING |
| THE SOUNDCOAT CO INC, PARAMOUNT DIE CORP, POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES INC, POLYMER MOLDED PRODUCTS LLC, WM T BURNETT & CO, CORNERSTONE MEDICAL SERVICES MIDWEST LLC and PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC |
| 25-1951 |
| May 15, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Personal Injury-Product Liability |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 ECF FILER: Reply by Appellant Derrick Martin King to clerk order. Certificate of Service dated 09/21/2025. Service made by ECF, Email [25-1951] (DMK) [Entered: 09/21/2025 08:50 PM] |
Filing 21
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing is granted. Appellant may file a supplemental reply within 14-days of the date of this order. (NF) [Entered: 09/08/2025 04:50 PM]
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER (Clerk) The Motion by Appellant to Amend Caption is hereby denied. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 12(a), the Clerk is required to docket the appeal under the title of the district court action. In addition, the first party listed on the District Court docket is the entity named in the short caption for the appeal. As the first party listed on the District Court docket is The Soundcoat Company Inc., the short caption for this appeal will remain as is. (SB) [Entered: 07/30/2025 08:13 AM]
|
| Filing 19 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Derrick Martin King to amend caption. Certificate of Service dated 06/16/2025. Service made by ECF, Email. [25-1951] (DMK) [Entered: 06/16/2025 02:24 PM] |
|
Filing 18
ORDER (Clerk) The Motion by Appellant to Waive Requirements to file Paper Copies of Brief and Appendix is denied as unnecessary at this time. It is noted that a briefing schedule has not been issued in this case. (SB) [Entered: 06/16/2025 09:24 AM]
|
| Filing 17 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Derrick Martin King for leave to file a Supplemental Reply to Plaintiff-Appellant Derrick Martin King's Omnibus Motion for Leave to File a Reply to Philips RS North America LLC (ECF No. 12); and Motion for Leave to File a Reply to Cornerstone Medical Services-Midwest LLC (ECF No. 16). Certificate of Service dated 06/10/2025. Service made by ECF, Email. [25-1951] (DMK) [Entered: 06/10/2025 08:08 PM] |
| Filing 16 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee Cornerstone Medical Services Midwest LLC to Legal Division letter. Certificate of Service dated 06/10/2025. [25-1951] (ELH) [Entered: 06/10/2025 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 15 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Cornerstone Medical Services Midwest LLC. [25-1951] (ELH) [Entered: 06/10/2025 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 14 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Erin Lucas Hamilton on behalf of Appellee(s) Cornerstone Medical Services Midwest, Inc.. [25-1951] (ELH) [Entered: 06/10/2025 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 13 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Franco A. Corrado on behalf of Appellee(s) Philips RS North America LLC. [25-1951] (FAC) [Entered: 06/10/2025 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee Philips RS North America LLC to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 06/10/2025. [25-1951] (JPL) [Entered: 06/10/2025 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Philips RS North America LLC. [25-1951] (JPL) [Entered: 06/10/2025 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from John P. Lavelle, Jr. on behalf of Appellee(s) Philips RS North America LLC. [25-1951] (JPL) [Entered: 06/10/2025 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER:Motion by Appellant to Waive Requirements to file Paper Copies of Brief and Appendix. Certificate of Service dated 06/03/2025. Service made by ECF, Email. [25-1951]--[Edited 06/16/2025 by SB] (DMK) [Entered: 06/03/2025 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Derrick Martin King for issuance of certificate of appealability. Certificate of Service dated 05/27/2025. Service made by ECF, Email. [25-1951] (DMK) [Entered: 05/27/2025 08:21 AM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Derrick Martin King The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, not to exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. (SB) [Entered: 05/20/2025 04:19 PM]
|
| Filing 6 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 05/20/2025 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Derrick Martin King advising this court that transcripts are not needed. [25-1951] (DMK) [Entered: 05/15/2025 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Derrick Martin King for leave to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 05/15/2025. Service made by Email. [25-1951] (DMK) [Entered: 05/15/2025 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (SB) [Entered: 05/15/2025 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB) [Entered: 05/15/2025 09:57 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Derrick Martin King in District Court No. 2:24-cv-01693. (SB) [Entered: 05/15/2025 09:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
