Christopher Nguyen v. Mary Johnson, et al
| CHRISTOPHER NGUYEN |
| MARY T. JOHNSON, ASST DIST. ATT. BERKS COUNTY, PA., BRIAN MCDONALD, ASST. DIST. ATT. BERKS COUNTY, PA., JEFFREY M. REICHART, DETECTIVE, READING, PA, POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAROLD T. SHENK, DETECTIVE, READING, PA, POLICE DEPARTMENT, SCOTT E. SHULTZ, DETECTIVE, READING, PA, POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANGEL CABRERRA, DETECTIVE, READING, PA, POLICE DEPARTMENT, DOE RODRIGUZ, DETECTIVE, READING, PA, POLICE DEPARTMENT, JUDY WISE, DETECTIVE, READING, PA, POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHRISTOPHER CORTAZZO, POL. OFF. READING, PA, POLICE DEPARTMENT, D. VARNER, CHIEF GRIEVANCE OFF. PENNSYLVANIA D.O.C.S., MARK WAHL, SUPERINTENDENT, AT SCI-WAYMART, PA/D.O.C.S, ERIC KOSAKOWSKI, SEC. CAPTAIN, SCI-WAYMART, PA/D.O.C.S. and KERRY MOORE, ASS. CHIEF GRIEV OFF. PENNSYLVANIA D.O.C.S. |
| 25-2020 |
| June 2, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Christopher Nguyen v. Mary Johnson |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Christopher Nguyen to listing order advising submitted for PLRA 1915(e)(2) and possible summary action [5388143-3]. Certificate of Service dated 08/10/2025. Service made by US mail. (JK) [Entered: 08/15/2025 04:34 PM] |
Filing 11
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Christopher Nguyen. The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. (GCH) [Entered: 07/21/2025 08:55 AM]
|
| Filing 10 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Christopher Nguyen. (JK) [Entered: 07/11/2025 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF POVERTY filed by Appellant Christopher Nguyen to Accompany Motion Proceed In Forma Pauperis.--[Edited 07/16/2025 by CJG] (JK) [Entered: 07/11/2025 04:41 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER (Clerk) The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is held in abeyance pending submission of additional documents. Appellant must submit a completed affidavit of poverty. A copy of the affidavit of poverty form is hereby transmitted to Appellant. Failure to submit this form within 14 days of the date of this order may result in dismissal of the appeal. (SB) [Entered: 06/30/2025 10:12 AM]
|
| Filing 7 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Christopher Nguyen. (JK) [Entered: 06/24/2025 01:44 PM] |
| Filing 6 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Christopher Nguyen. (JK) [Entered: 06/24/2025 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 5 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Christopher Nguyen. (JK) [Entered: 06/24/2025 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION filed by Appellant Christopher Nguyen to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (JK) [Entered: 06/24/2025 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (JK) [Entered: 06/02/2025 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 06/02/2025 11:17 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Christopher Nguyen in District Court No. 5:25-cv-00242. (JK) [Entered: 06/02/2025 11:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
