Jarvis Roberts v. State of Pennsylvania, et al
| JARVIS ROBERTS |
| STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, COUNTY OF BERKS, CITY OF READING, JOHN ADAMS, DENNIS SKAYHAN, THOMAS PARISI, MARGARET MCDONOUGH, JAMES GOLDSMITH, RACHEL LOUVIAUX, MICHAEL PERKINS, JAY NIGRINI, MICHAEL A. WALKER and JOSE GAVILANES |
| 25-2051 |
| June 3, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Jarvis Roberts to listing order advising submitted for 1915(e)(2) and possible summary action. (LMR) [Entered: 07/01/2025 04:26 PM] |
Filing 14
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Jarvis Roberts The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. The briefing and scheduling order, issued June 4, 2025, is hereby VACATED. A new briefing and scheduling order will be issued at the appropriate time. (LMR) [Entered: 06/16/2025 10:11 AM]
|
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Sean A. Kirkpatrick on behalf of Appellee(s) State of Pennsylvania. [25-2051] (SAK) [Entered: 06/12/2025 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Brian C. Conley on behalf of Appellee(s) City of Reading. [25-2051] (BCC) [Entered: 06/12/2025 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from David J. MacMain on behalf of Appellee(s) City of Reading. [25-2051] (DJM) [Entered: 06/12/2025 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION filed by Appellant Jarvis Roberts to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (LMR) [Entered: 06/13/2025 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Kimberly A. Boyer-Cohen on behalf of Appellee(s) County of Berks, John Adams, Dennis Skayhan, James Goldsmith, Rachel Louviaux and Michael Perkins. [25-2051] (KAB) [Entered: 06/11/2025 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Nicole Feigenbaum on behalf of Appellee(s) Judge Thomas Parisi. [25-2051] (NAF) [Entered: 06/11/2025 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Thomas J. Zimmerman on behalf of Appellee(s) Jay Nigrini, Esquire. [25-2051] (TJZ) [Entered: 06/09/2025 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (LMR) [Entered: 06/05/2025 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Jarvis Roberts due on or before 07/15/2025. Appendix due on or before 07/15/2025. [VACATED pursuant to Court Order entered 06/16/25] (LMR) [Entered: 06/05/2025 08:54 AM] |
| Filing 4 Copy of Amended Notice of Appeal filed 05/28/2025 received from Clerk of District Court. (LMR) [Entered: 06/03/2025 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 06/03/2025 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (LMR) [Entered: 06/03/2025 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Jarvis Roberts in District Court No. 5:22-cv-04829. (LMR) [Entered: 06/03/2025 01:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.