James Stokes v. Markel American Insurance Co
| JAMES STOKES |
| MARKEL AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, a foreign corporation |
| 25-2092 |
| June 10, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Insurance |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 TEXT ORDER (Clerk) granting unopposed motion for extension of time filed by Appellant James Stokes to file brief and appendix until 12/15/2025. (GCH) [Entered: 11/20/2025 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 16 ECF FILER: UNOPPOSED Motion filed by Appellant James Stokes for Extension of Time to file Appellant's Initial Brief until/for December 15, 2025. Certificate of Service dated 11/19/2025. Service made by ECF. [25-2092] (SBB) [Entered: 11/19/2025 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 15 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (AMR) [Entered: 10/17/2025 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 14 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant James Stokes due on or before 11/26/2025. Appendix due on or before 11/26/2025. (AMR) [Entered: 10/17/2025 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 13 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Daryll Hawthorne-Bernardo on behalf of Appellee(s) Markel American Insurance Company. [25-2092] (DH) [Entered: 07/09/2025 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant James Stokes advising this court that no transcripts are available. [25-2092] (SBB) [Entered: 07/08/2025 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 11 Notice to Counsel. The attached document is restricted. To view document, click on the document number link in the NDA (Notice of Docket Activity). In order to access this document, you must be the attorney of record using your individual ECF login and password. (SY) [Entered: 06/26/2025 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 10 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Attorney Stephen B. Brauerman, Esq. for Appellant James Stokes requesting the following document(s): Transcript Purchase Order on or before 07/09/2025. (AMR) [Entered: 06/25/2025 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant James Stokes. [25-2092] (SBB) [Entered: 06/24/2025 06:06 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant James Stokes. [25-2092] (SBB) [Entered: 06/24/2025 05:59 PM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Stephen B. Brauerman on behalf of Appellant(s) James Stokes. [25-2092] (SBB) [Entered: 06/24/2025 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Markel American Insurance Co. [25-2092] (MLP) [Entered: 06/17/2025 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Timothy S. Martin on behalf of Appellee(s) Markel American Insurance Company. [25-2092] (TSM) [Entered: 06/17/2025 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Marc L. Penchansky on behalf of Appellee(s) Markel American Insurance Company. [25-2092] (MLP) [Entered: 06/17/2025 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (AMR) [Entered: 06/10/2025 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 06/10/2025 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant James Stokes in District Court No. 1:19-cv-02014. (AMR) [Entered: 06/10/2025 11:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
