Adam Strege v. National Mail Handler s Union, et al
| ADAM STREGE |
| NATIONAL MAIL HANDLER S UNION, RAYMOND FLORES, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE U.S. |
| 25-2571 |
| August 13, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER (Clerk) dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR Misc. 107.2(b), for failure to file a brief and appendix on behalf of appellant. Case terminated on 01/06/2026. (PDB) [Entered: 01/06/2026 12:01 PM]
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (KR) [Entered: 08/14/2025 12:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Adam Strege due on or before 09/23/2025. Appendix due on or before 09/23/2025. (KR) [Entered: 08/14/2025 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (PDB) [Entered: 08/13/2025 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 08/13/2025 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Adam Strege in District Court No. 1:25-cv-13032. (PDB) [Entered: 08/13/2025 03:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
