Bradley Livingston v. City of Englewood
| BRADLEY LIVINGSTON |
| CITY OF ENGLEWOOD |
| 25-2792 |
| September 17, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER (KRAUSE, MATEY and BOVE, Circuit Judges) The appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. As relevant here, the Court's jurisdiction is limited to reviewing final orders. See 28 U.S.C. Section: 1291. An order denying a motion to recuse is not immediately appealable and is "reviewable only after final judgment." See City of Pittsburgh v. Simmons, 729 F.2d 953, 954 (3d Cir. 1984). Panel No.: BLD-046. KRAUSE, Authoring Judge.--[Edited 01/08/2026 by JK] (JK) [Entered: 01/08/2026 10:04 AM]
|
| Filing 14 REPLY on behalf of Appellant Bradley Livingston in 25-2792 to Appellee's Response to Legal Division Letter. Certificate of Service dated 11/25/2025. Service made by Email. [25-2792, 25-2811] (SB) [Entered: 11/25/2025 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 13 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee City of Englewood in 25-2811, 25-2792 to Legal Division letter. Certificate of Service dated 11/17/2025. [25-2811, 25-2792] (SCS) [Entered: 11/17/2025 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Stefani C Schwartz, Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) City of Englewood. [25-2811, 25-2792] (SCS) [Entered: 10/21/2025 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 11 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Stefani C. Schwartz, Esq. for Appellee City of Englewood and Toni L. Telles, Esq. for Appellee City of Englewood requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 10/28/2025. (JK) [Entered: 10/21/2025 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Bradley Livingston to possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect [ # 7 ]. Certificate of Service dated 10/02/2025. Service made by Email, ECF. (JK) [Entered: 10/03/2025 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 10 BRIEF RECEIVED. As no briefing schedule has yet issued, the brief is construed as a document in support of the appeal. If after disposition of the pending motions the appeal is to proceed to briefing, the parties will be advised regarding the filing date of this brief and the date for filing a responsive brief. Certificate of Service dated 10/02/2025. Service made by ECF, Email. (JK) [Entered: 10/03/2025 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 8 CLERK ORDER Consolidating the Appeals at Nos. 25-2792 & 25-2811 for all purposes. [25-2792, 25-2811] (GCH) [Entered: 09/29/2025 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 7 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 09/19/2025 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (SB) [Entered: 09/17/2025 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 4 Notice to Court of Appeal from Appellant. Certificate of Service dated 09/17/2025. Service made by ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 09/17/2025 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB) [Entered: 09/17/2025 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Bradley Livingston in District Court No. 2:24-cv-06396. (SB) [Entered: 09/17/2025 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 3 Copies of documents filed in District by Appellant. Certificate of Service dated 09/17/2025. Service made by ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 09/17/2025 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 6 Brief Received. As no briefing schedule has yet issued, the brief is construed as a document in support of the appeal. If after disposition of the pending motions the appeal is to proceed to briefing, the parties will be advised regarding the filing date of this brief and the date for filing a responsive brief. Certificate of Service dated 09/15/2025. Service made by Email. (SB) [Entered: 09/19/2025 10:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Bradley Livingston v. City of Englewood | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BRADLEY LIVINGSTON | |
| Represented By: | Bradley Livingston |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CITY OF ENGLEWOOD | |
| Represented By: | Toni L. Telles Esq. |
| Represented By: | Stefani C. Schwartz Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
