Preston Walters v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
| PRESTON WAYNE WALTERS |
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, WARDEN FAYETTE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA |
| 25-2800 |
| September 16, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 PETITION filed by Appellant Preston Wayne Walters for Rehearing En Banc and before Original Panel. Service made by Court on 03/12/2026. (TMM) [Entered: 03/12/2026 12:27 PM] |
Filing 16
ORDER (SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge) The foregoing motion by Appellant to file rehearing exhibits is granted. Shwartz, Authoring Judge. (TMM) [Entered: 03/12/2026 12:24 PM]
|
| Filing 15 MOTION filed by Appellant Preston Wayne Walters to File Exhibits to Petition for Rehearing. Certificate of Service dated 03/03/2026. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 03/11/2026 05:01 PM] |
| Filing 14 LETTER from Appellant Preston Wayne Walters. (TMM) [Entered: 03/05/2026 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 13 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Appellant Preston Wayne Walters requesting motion to file rehearing exhibits. Compliance due 03/13/2026. (TMM) [Entered: 02/24/2026 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 12 LETTER from Appellant Preston Wayne Walters. (TMM) [Entered: 02/12/2026 03:14 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER (SHWARTZ, FREEMAN and CHUNG, Circuit Judges) Appellant's request for a certificate of appealability is denied. Jurists of reason would agree, without debate, that Appellant's petition for writ of habeas corpus was not timely filed. Appellant's remaining motions are denied. Panel No.: ALD-073. Shwartz, Authoring Judge. (TMM) [Entered: 02/04/2026 09:58 AM]
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER (Clerk) No action will be taken on the motion as it is unnecessary. It is noted that the District Court previously granted Appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (TMM) [Entered: 10/22/2025 04:22 PM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Preston Wayne Walters to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 10/13/2025. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 10/22/2025 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Preston Wayne Walters for Appointment of Counsel. (TMM) [Entered: 09/30/2025 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Preston Wayne Walters to address the lower trial courts abuse of discretion, continuing to show bias, and prejudice towards this pro se petitioner, as order dated 9-11-2025. Certificate of Service dated 09/17/2025. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 09/30/2025 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 8 Request by Appellant Preston Walters to amend brief previously submitted with certificate of appeal, relied upon as Exhibits: A pgs1-4, A1 pgs 5-16, AZ pgs 17-28 as to add clarity. (TMM) [Entered: 09/30/2025 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 5 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Preston Wayne Walters. (TMM) [Entered: 09/24/2025 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (SH) [Entered: 09/19/2025 12:43 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (TMM) [Entered: 09/16/2025 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMM) [Entered: 09/16/2025 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Preston Wayne Walters in District Court No. 1:25-cv-00071. (TMM) [Entered: 09/16/2025 11:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
