Radee Prince v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center
| RADEE LABEEB PRINCE |
| WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE |
| 25-2953 |
| October 9, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (MW) [Entered: 10/15/2025 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant Radee Labeeb Prince for Certificate of Appealability. Response due on 10/24/2025. Certificate of Service dated 10/14/2025. Service made by ECF. (TMK) [Entered: 10/14/2025 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Andrew J. Vella on behalf of Appellee(s) Brian Emig, Warden James T. Vaughn Correctional Center and Kathleen Jennings, Attorney General of the State of Delaware. [25-2953] (AJV) [Entered: 10/13/2025 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (TMK) [Entered: 10/09/2025 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMK) [Entered: 10/09/2025 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Radee Labeeb Prince in District Court No. 1:22-cv-1219. (TMK) [Entered: 10/09/2025 11:08 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
