Yu Kuo v. Attorney General United States of America
Petitioner: YU LAN KUO
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 25-2972
Filed: October 9, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2026 Filing 18 MANDATE ISSUED. (TMM) [Entered: 03/30/2026 08:31 AM]
February 4, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER (SHWARTZ, FREEMAN and CHUNG, Circuit Judges) The Government's motion for summary action and dismissal for lack of appellate jurisdiction is granted. Accordingly, we summarily deny the petition for review in part and dismiss it in part for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner's motion to stay removal is denied. The temporary administrative stay of removal issued by the Clerk on October 10, 2025, is vacated. Panel ID: ALD-069 Judge: SHWARTZ Authoring (TMM) [Entered: 02/04/2026 11:20 AM]
November 21, 2025 Filing 16 ECF FILER: Response filed by Respondent Attorney General United States of America to motion to stay removal. Certificate of Service dated 11/21/2025. [25-2972] (BPH) [Entered: 11/21/2025 08:21 AM]
November 21, 2025 Filing 15 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Respondent Attorney General United States of America to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction, to summarily dismiss. Certificate of Service dated 11/21/2025. Service made by ECF. [25-2972] (BPH) [Entered: 11/21/2025 08:20 AM]
October 27, 2025 Filing 14 Court of Appeals fee paid. Receipt No. 300002744. Receipt dated 10/27/2025. (TMM) [Entered: 10/27/2025 03:46 PM]
October 21, 2025 Filing 13 ECF FILER: ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. [25-2972] (TS) [Entered: 10/21/2025 11:36 AM]
October 20, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion is granted. The pending case shall be stayed pending the lapse in appropriations. Once the shut down has ended, the pending motion will be considered by the Court. It is noted that an administrative stay of removal is currently in place. Despite the current lapse of appropriations and its impact on the Office of Immigration Litigation, Respondent is required to promptly inform the clerk in writing as to any change to the custody/detention status of the petitioner including transfers to another detention facility if petitioner is already detained by immigration authorities and transfers from prison custody (local, state, or federal facility) to immigration detention. (TMM) [Entered: 10/20/2025 12:19 PM]
October 16, 2025 Filing 11 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Respondent Attorney General United States of America to stay to stay deadline to respond to Petitioner's motion for a stay of removal. Certificate of Service dated 10/16/2025. Service made by ECF. [25-2972] (BPH) [Entered: 10/16/2025 03:27 PM]
October 10, 2025 Filing 10 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (TMM) [Entered: 10/10/2025 01:31 PM]
October 10, 2025 Filing 9 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Brendan Hogan on behalf of Respondent(s) Pamela Bondi, US Attorney General. [25-2972] (BPH) [Entered: 10/10/2025 11:26 AM]
October 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER (Clerk) temporarily granting motion for stay of removal in accordance with the Standing Order of the Court dated August 5, 2015. Removal is stayed until such time as the Court can consider the motion for stay of removal. (TMM) [Entered: 10/10/2025 09:46 AM]
October 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the administrative record. (TMM) [Entered: 10/10/2025 09:37 AM]
October 9, 2025 Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed on behalf of Petitioner Yu Lan Kuo. (TMM) [Entered: 10/10/2025 10:03 AM]
October 9, 2025 Filing 7 AGENCY DOCKETING STATEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Yu Lan Kuo, received. (TMM) [Entered: 10/10/2025 09:53 AM]
October 9, 2025 Filing 6 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Ai Tong, Esq. for Petitioner Yu Lan Kuo.. (TMM) [Entered: 10/10/2025 09:52 AM]
October 9, 2025 Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioner Yu Lan Kuo to stay removal. Response due on 10/20/2025. Certificate of Service dated 10/09/2025. Service made by ECF. (TMM) [Entered: 10/10/2025 09:35 AM]
October 9, 2025 Filing 1 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Yu Lan Kuo. Certificate of Service dated 10/09/2025. Service made by ECF. Petition filed electronically on Received via ECF on 10/9/25 at 5:01 pm. Payment made through pay.gov.. Receipt No. A03-67760-184. (TMM) [Entered: 10/10/2025 09:32 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Yu Kuo v. Attorney General United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: YU LAN KUO
Represented By: Ai Tong Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Brendan P. Hogan Esq.
Represented By: Pamela Bondi Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?