Charles Talbert v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
| CHARLES TALBERT |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI |
| 25-3181 |
| November 17, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RETURNED MAIL. U.S. Postal Service returned Case Opening Packet [ # 1 ] sent to Appellant Charles Talbert. Mail was returned because Refused. No forwarding address is available. (JK) [Entered: 01/20/2026 05:48 PM] |
| Filing 5 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (MW) [Entered: 11/20/2025 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Andrew Metzger on behalf of Appellee(s) Attorney General Pennsylvania; District Attorney Philadelphia; Supt. Phoenix SCI. [25-3181] (AM) [Entered: 11/19/2025 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (JK) [Entered: 11/17/2025 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 2 PARTIAL RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF.--[Edited 12/16/2025 by JK] (JK) [Entered: 11/17/2025 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Charles Talbert in District Court No. 2:24-cv-03309. (JK) [Entered: 11/17/2025 10:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.