Dwayne Wright v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
Plaintiff: DWAYNE WRIGHT
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 25-3285
Filed: November 18, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2026 Filing 7 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Appellant Dwayne Wright requesting compliance for Petition for en banc rehearing, Petition for panel rehearing. Compliance due 05/19/2026. (AMR) [Entered: 05/05/2026 10:42 AM]
April 27, 2026 Filing 6 PETITION filed by Appellant Dwayne Wright for Rehearing En Banc and before Original Panel. Certificate of Service dated 04/19/2026. (AMR) [Entered: 05/05/2026 10:41 AM]
March 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER (SHWARTZ, FREEMAN and CHUNG, Circuit Judges) Wrights request for a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c). Jurists of reason would agree, without debate, that the District Court properly denied Wrights habeas petition for essentially the reasons set forth in the District Courts opinion. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). More specifically, Wrights claims are barred by Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465 (1976), inexcusably procedurally defaulted, or meritless. Panel No.: ALD-103. FREEMAN, Authoring Judge. (AMR) [Entered: 03/23/2026 04:38 PM]
November 24, 2025 Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect., AND advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (SH) [Entered: 11/24/2025 11:10 AM]
November 18, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (AMR) [Entered: 11/18/2025 04:22 PM]
November 18, 2025 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 11/18/2025 04:21 PM]
November 18, 2025 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Dwayne Wright in District Court No. 1:24-cv-00016. (AMR) [Entered: 11/18/2025 04:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dwayne Wright v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DWAYNE WRIGHT
Represented By: Dwayne Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: Ronald Eisenberg Esq.
Represented By: Susan E. Affronti Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?