Shondale Lewis v. American Express Co., et al
| SHONDALE PAUL LEWIS, Sui Juris |
| AMERICAN EXPRESS CO, c/o Christophe Le Caillec, CFO and CHRISTOPHE LE CAILLEC, CFO |
| 25-3341 |
| December 2, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Consumer Credit |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Appellant's Stamtent in Support of the Appeal. Certificate of Service dated 01/16/2026. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 02/03/2026 04:56 PM] |
Filing 11
ORDER (FREEMAN, Circuit Judge) Per this Courts practice, Appellants financial affidavit is restricted so that only parties to this appeal and Court personnel may access it from the electronic docket. Given thoserestrictions, the foregoing motion is denied.. Panel No.: ACO-038. Freeman, Authoring Judge. (SB) [Entered: 01/07/2026 02:21 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER (Clerk) The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Appellant was previously advised that the appeal will be submitted for possible dismissal due to a question regarding jurisdiction. The appeal will also be submitted to a panel of this court for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) as to whether the appeal will be dismissed as legally frivolous or whether summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 is appropriate. In making this determination, the district court opinion and record will be examined. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. Appellee need not file a response unless directed to do so. The Court may reconsider in forma pauperis status or request additional information at any time during the course of this appeal. The motion to seal Appellants in forma pauperis financial affidavit is referred to a motions panel. (SB) [Entered: 01/05/2026 09:46 AM]
|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Shondale Paul Lewis to the Court's Jurisdictional Notice. Certificate of Service dated 12/13/2025. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 12/29/2025 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION filed by Appellant Shondale Paul Lewis to Seal Motion to Seal In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 12/22/2025. Certificate of Service dated 12/08/2025. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 12/29/2025 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Shondale Paul Lewis to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 12/22/2025. Certificate of Service dated 12/08/2025. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 12/29/2025 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellees American Express Co and Christopher Le Caillec. [25-3341] (BCF) [Entered: 12/11/2025 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Brian C. Frontino on behalf of Appellee(s) Christopher Le Caillec, American Express Co.. [25-3341] (BCF) [Entered: 12/11/2025 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 12/04/2025 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (SB) [Entered: 12/02/2025 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB) [Entered: 12/02/2025 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Shondale Paul Lewis in District Court No. 5:25-cv-04375. (SB) [Entered: 12/02/2025 09:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
