Brandon Price v. Associated Press
| BRANDON PRICE |
| ASSOCIATED PRESS |
| 25-3391 |
| December 8, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Brandon Price v. Associated Press |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MANDATE ISSUED. (KR) [Entered: 05/29/2026 10:43 AM]
|
Filing 12
ORDER (CHAGARES, Chief Judge, HARDIMAN, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS, PORTER, MATEY, PHIPPS, FREEMAN, MONTGOMERY-REEVES, CHUNG, BOVE, MASCOTT and *NYGAARD, Circuit Judges) denying Petition for en banc and panel rehearing filed by Appellant Brandon Price. Montgomery-Reeves, Authoring Judge. *Judge Nygaards vote is limited to panel rehearing. (KR) [Entered: 05/21/2026 12:17 PM]
|
Filing 11
PETITION filed by Appellant Brandon Price for Rehearing En Banc and before Original Panel. Certificate of Service dated. (KR) [Entered: 05/07/2026 03:22 PM]
|
Filing 10
JUDGMENT, Affirmed. (KR) [Entered: 04/24/2026 09:50 AM]
|
Filing 9
NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: MATEY, MONTGOMERY-REEVES and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 5. (KR) [Entered: 04/24/2026 09:49 AM]
|
Filing 8
SUBMITTED (PRO SE - 3rd Cir. LAR 34.1 (a)) Tuesday, April 14, 2026 on APPELLANT'S BRIEF ONLY. Panel: MATEY, MONTGOMERY-REEVES, NYGAARD, Circuit Judges. (KY) [Entered: 04/14/2026 08:41 AM]
|
Filing 7
CALENDARED for Tuesday, 04/14/2026. (AR) [Entered: 03/25/2026 01:14 PM]
|
Filing 6
PRO SE BRIEF on behalf of Appellant Brandon Price. Pages: 7, Certificate of Service dated 01/12/2026 made by the Clerk's Office. (KEL) [Entered: 01/12/2026 04:16 PM]
|
Filing 5
NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (KR) [Entered: 12/11/2025 02:41 PM]
|
Filing 4
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Brandon Price due on or before 01/20/2026. Appendix due on or before 01/20/2026. (KR) [Entered: 12/11/2025 02:39 PM]
|
Filing 3
NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (KR) [Entered: 12/08/2025 05:00 PM]
|
Filing 2
RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (KR) [Entered: 12/08/2025 05:00 PM]
|
Filing 1
CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Brandon Price in District Court No. 2:25-cv-00648. (KR) [Entered: 12/08/2025 03:58 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Brandon Price v. Associated Press | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BRANDON PRICE | |
| Represented By: | Brandon Price |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ASSOCIATED PRESS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.