Frederick Torrence v. Matthew L. Harris, Sr., et al
Plaintiff: FREDERICK M. TORRENCE
Defendant: EMMIE HARRIS, MATTHEW L. HARRIS, SR. and DENITA TORRENCE
Case Number: 26-1136
Filed: January 22, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2026 Filing 8 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Frederick M. Torrence to listing order advising submitted for 1915(e)(2) and possible summary action [5471875-3]. Certificate of Service dated 02/23/2026. Service made by US mail. (CLW) [Entered: 02/25/2026 03:25 PM]
February 17, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Frederick M. Torrence The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. (ARR) [Entered: 02/17/2026 11:57 AM]
February 12, 2026 Filing 6 Document filed by Appellant in support of appeal. Certificate of Service dated 02/07/2026. Service made by US mail. (CLW) [Entered: 02/12/2026 03:53 PM]
February 12, 2026 Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant Frederick M. Torrence to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 02/20/2026. Certificate of Service dated 02/07/2026. Service made by US mail. (CLW) [Entered: 02/12/2026 03:52 PM]
January 26, 2026 Filing 4 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Frederick M. Torrence to letter advising of possible dismissal [ # 3 ]. Certificate of Service dated 01/25/2026. (TMM) [Entered: 01/29/2026 02:30 PM]
January 23, 2026 Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (NAF) [Entered: 01/23/2026 05:01 PM]
January 22, 2026 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CLW) [Entered: 01/22/2026 01:43 PM]
January 22, 2026 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Frederick M. Torrence in District Court No. 1:25-cv-00300. (CLW) [Entered: 01/22/2026 01:35 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Frederick Torrence v. Matthew L. Harris, Sr., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FREDERICK M. TORRENCE
Represented By: Frederick M. Torrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EMMIE HARRIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MATTHEW L. HARRIS, SR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DENITA TORRENCE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?