In re: Eric Rambert
Petitioner: In re: ERIC X. RAMBERT
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Case Number: 26-1264
Filed: February 10, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2026 Filing 7 PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Eric X. Rambert for Rehearing En Banc and before Original Panel. Certificate of Service dated 03/11/2026. (AMR) [Entered: 03/17/2026 04:21 PM]
March 3, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER (RESTREPO, PORTER and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Circuit Judges) Petitioners motion to waive filing all prior applications, which we construe as a request to be relieved of the filing requirements of Local Appellate Rule 22.5, is granted. Petitioners application for permission to file a second or successive habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is denied. Petitioner has failed to make a prima facie showing that his proposed habeas petition relies on (1) a new rule of constitutional law that the United States Supreme Court has made retroactive to cases on collateral review, or (2) newly discovered evidence that, if proven, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found him guilty of his underlying offenses. See 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(2), (b)(3)(C). Panel No.: DLD-084. PORTER, Authoring Judge. (AMR) [Entered: 03/03/2026 04:05 PM]
February 17, 2026 Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Ronald M. Wabby, Jr. on behalf of Appellee(s) All Appellees. [26-1264] (RMW) [Entered: 02/17/2026 12:43 PM]
February 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER (Clerk) No action will be taken on Petitioners motion as it is unnecessary. No filing fee is required for an Application for Leave to File a Second or Successive Application for Relief Under 28 U.S.C. Sections 2254 or 2255. (AMR) [Entered: 02/10/2026 01:07 PM]
February 10, 2026 Filing 3 MOTION filed by Petitioner Mr. Eric X. Rambert to be Relieved from the Filing Requirements of Third Circuit LAR 22.5. Certificate of Service dated 01/24/2026. Service made by US mail. (AMR) [Entered: 02/10/2026 01:00 PM]
February 10, 2026 Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioner Mr. Eric X. Rambert to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 01/24/2026. Service made by US mail. (AMR) [Entered: 02/10/2026 12:56 PM]
February 10, 2026 Filing 1 Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(b) filed. Notice filed by Petitioner Mr. Eric X. Rambert. Placed in Prison Mail on 01/24/2026. Received in the Court of Appeals on 02/05/2026. (AMR) [Entered: 02/10/2026 12:50 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Eric Rambert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: ERIC X. RAMBERT
Represented By: Eric X. Rambert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Represented By: Ronald M. Wabby Esq. Jr.
Represented By: District Attorney Allegheny County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?