In re: Courtney Miller, et al
| In re: COURTNEY MILLER |
| ERIC MILLER, LUZERNE COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LUZERNE COUNTY, JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, JR. and COUNTY OF LUZERNE |
| 26-1325 |
| February 13, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
PER CURIAM ORDER (SHWARTZ, FREEMAN and CHUNG, Circuit Judges) The petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, denied. Panel No.: ALD-097. (CJG) [Entered: 03/26/2026 07:57 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: SHWARTZ, FREEMAN and CHUNG, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 4. ALD-097 (CJG) [Entered: 03/26/2026 07:47 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
Status letter from the petitioner. Service made by the Clerk's office via CM.ECF on 03/17/2026. (PDB) [Entered: 03/17/2026 03:09 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion is granted. The Court may reconsider in forma pauperis status or request additional information at any time during the course of these proceedings. (PDB) [Entered: 02/27/2026 04:08 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION filed by Petitioner Courtney Miller to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (PDB) [Entered: 02/23/2026 04:27 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Courtney Miller requesting remit payment of the $600.00 docketing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit. Compliance due 02/27/2026. (See Order for Full Text). (PDB) [Entered: 02/13/2026 03:58 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner Courtney Miller. (PDB) [Entered: 02/13/2026 03:51 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
