In re: Kmel
Petitioner: In re: KMEL
Respondent: ARTHUR L. ZULICK, CYRIL D. HIGGINS, JR., KATE BEST, NINTI MATEEN, SHIRLEY WOOD, MICHELLE WARSAW, TODD W. WEITZMANN, CURT PETER MITCHELL, AVAMARIE MITCHELL, JEREMY BARNUM, ROBERT LAY, JUANITA RUSSELL and PHILLIP J. CARABALLO
Case Number: 26-1393
Filed: February 24, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2026 Filing 11 ECF FILER: OBJECTION to Clerk's Ruling on Taxation of Costs filed by Petitioner Kmel.Certificate of Service dated 04/22/2026.. Service made by ECF. [26-1393] (K) [Entered: 04/22/2026 10:48 PM]
April 21, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER (Clerk) Action on the status report is hereby deferred pending Petitioners compliance with the March 23, 2026 Clerks Order. A copy of the order is enclosed for Petitioners convenience. The petition and other filings will not be submitted to the Court until the compliance requested in the March 23, 2206 order is received. If compliance is not received by April 28, 2026, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. (SB) [Entered: 04/21/2026 11:52 AM]
April 20, 2026 Filing 9 ECF FILER:Status Report filed by Petitioner advising of Imminent Mootness and Continued Abatement of Middle District Court Proceedings, with Requests for Court to take judicial notice of continued abeyance; to enter order staying enforcement proceedings in District Court; and to expedite order on pending petition. Certificate of Service dated 04/20/2026. Service made by ECF. [26-1393]--[Edited 04/21/2026 by SB] (K) [Entered: 04/20/2026 03:59 PM]
April 14, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER (Clerk) granting motion for extension of time filed by Petitioner Kmel. Petitioner must file the a motion for leave to proceed in forma paupers and a certification of service on opposing parties within (14) fourteen days from the date of this order. (SB) [Entered: 04/14/2026 03:34 PM]
April 13, 2026 Filing 7 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Petitioner Kmel for Extension of Time to file Order docket #6 until/for 5-10 days of grace.. Certificate of Service dated 04/13/2026. Service made by ECF. [26-1393] (K) [Entered: 04/13/2026 07:37 AM]
March 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER (Clerk) After the above-captioned petition for an extraordinary writ was received, the petitioner was ordered to bring the petition into compliance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 21 by paying the required fee and filing a certificate showing that a copy of the petition has been served on the other parties and provided to the district-court judge. Action on the above-captioned petition and IFP remains deferred. In lieu of paying the fee, the petitioner submitted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). The motion is not, however, sufficiently complete for the Court to rule on at this time. As it appears that Petitioner is not confined or otherwise detained, an amended affidavit detailing Petitioners account balances and available cash in Section 4 and the expenses Petitioner incurs on average per month in Section 8 of the affidavit must be filed. Another copy of a blank affidavit is enclosed for Petitioners convenience. Petitioner must submit the amended affidavit of poverty within 14 days of the date of this order or the appeal may be dismissed. Petitioner must also serve the petition on each party to the proceeding in the trial court (or on counsel for each party), and provide a copy of the petition for an extraordinary writ to the District Court judge. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(1). In addition, a copy of the IFP motion must be served on each party to the proceeding, to include the District Court judge. A certificate of service reflecting that the petition has been served must be submitted to the Court of Appeals within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. See Fed. R. App. P. 21, 25. Furthermore, attached to the IFP motion is a document purporting to be under seal titled Petition to Protect Identity, that appears to be a copy of a document filed in District Court. If Petitioner intends to file a document under seal, it must be accompanied by a separate motion to seal. Likewise, if Petitioner intends to proceed using a pseudonym, a separate motion seeking this Courts permission is required. If no such motion to proceed under a pseudonym is filed within 14 days, the Clerk may amend the docket to reveal the petitioners full name. The petition will not be submitted to the Court until the certificate of service is received. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(3). If it is not received by the deadline, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 107.1, 107.2. (SB) [Entered: 03/23/2026 10:25 AM]
March 11, 2026 Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Gerard J. Geiger on behalf of Respondent(s) Kate Best, Ninti Mateen, Shirley Wood, Michelle Warsaw, Todd W. Weitzmann. [26-1393] (GJG) [Entered: 03/11/2026 09:37 AM]
March 11, 2026 Filing 4 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Attorney Gerard J. Geiger, Esq. for Respondents Kate Best, Ninti Mateen, Shirley Wood, Michelle Warsaw and Todd W. Weitzmann requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 03/25/2026. (SB) [Entered: 03/11/2026 08:40 AM]
March 9, 2026 Filing 3 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Petitioner Kmel for leave to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 03/09/2026. Service made by ECF. [26-1393] (K) [Entered: 03/09/2026 09:12 AM]
February 24, 2026 Filing 2 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Kmel. On February 23, 2026, this Court received a document titled Petition for Emergency Stay (Under All Writs Act). The petition has been docketed as a petition for an extraordinary writ because it appears to seek that sort of relief from this Court. Action on the above-captioned petition is hereby deferred. Petitioner did not submit the docketing fee or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) with the petition. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either remit payment of the $600.00 docketing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit. A form IFP affidavit is enclosed for Petitioners convenience. It is noted that a petition for an extraordinary writ is an original action and a separate motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must be filed, regardless of Petitioners fee status in other proceedings. If the docketing fee is not paid or the IFP motion is not filed, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 3.3(a), 107.1(a). Petitioner must also serve the petition on each party to the proceeding in the trial court (or on counsel for each party), and provide a copy of the petition for an extraordinary writ to the District Court judge. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(1). In addition, a copy of the IFP motion must be served on each party to the proceeding, to include the District Court judge. A certificate of service reflecting that the petition has been served must be submitted to the Court of Appeals within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. See Fed. R. App. P. 21, 25. The petition will not be submitted to the Court until the docketing fee or IFP motion and the certificate of service are received. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(3). If they are not received by the deadline, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 107.1, 107.2. (SB) [Entered: 02/24/2026 04:00 PM]
February 24, 2026 Filing 1 PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner Kmel. (SB) [Entered: 02/24/2026 03:50 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Kmel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: KMEL
Represented By: Kmel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ARTHUR L. ZULICK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CYRIL D. HIGGINS, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: KATE BEST
Represented By: Gerard J. Geiger Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: NINTI MATEEN
Represented By: Gerard J. Geiger Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SHIRLEY WOOD
Represented By: Gerard J. Geiger Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MICHELLE WARSAW
Represented By: Gerard J. Geiger Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TODD W. WEITZMANN
Represented By: Gerard J. Geiger Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CURT PETER MITCHELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: AVAMARIE MITCHELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JEREMY BARNUM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ROBERT LAY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JUANITA RUSSELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PHILLIP J. CARABALLO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?