Stanley McMillan v. State of New Jersey, et al
| STANLEY MCMILLAN, I |
| STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX and VICTIMS OF CRIME COMPENSATION BOARD NEW JERSEY |
| 26-1427 |
| March 3, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC ADDENDUM to RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Mr. Stanley McMillan, I containing Certification of service. Certificate of Service dated 04/01/2026 by ECF. [26-1427] (SM) [Entered: 04/01/2026 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: CORRECTED ELECTRONIC ADDENDUM to RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Mr. Stanley McMillan, I containing Regarding the jurisdictional defect.. Certificate of Service dated 04/01/2026 by US mail, ECF. [26-1427] (SM) [Entered: 04/01/2026 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (NAF) [Entered: 03/05/2026 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (PDB) [Entered: 03/03/2026 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 03/03/2026 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Stanley McMillan in District Court No. 3:18-cv-12372. (PDB) [Entered: 03/03/2026 10:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
