USA v. Angel Rodriguez
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| ANGEL RODRIGUEZ |
| 26-1472 |
| March 4, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Attorney Brian Dobbins, Esq. for Appellee USA requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 04/14/2026. (LMR) [Entered: 03/31/2026 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 7 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (MW) [Entered: 03/25/2026 01:14 PM] |
| Filing 6 COPY OF ORDER OF DISTRICT COURT In light of the Order issued by Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, ECF No. 1278, remanding Defendant Rodriguez's appeal to the District Court for "the sole purpose of either issuing a certificate of appealability or stating reasons why a certificate of appealability should not issue," a certificate of appealability is hereby DENIED. Dated 03/16/2026 and signed by Honorable Robert A. Molloy. (TMM) [Entered: 03/25/2026 09:51 AM] |
Filing 5
ORDER (Clerk) remanding appeal to District Court for the purpose of either issuance of a certificate of appealability or a statement of reasons why one should not issue. The appeal is STAYED pending determination by the District Court. It is ordered that the parties file a status report to be filed on or before 04/06/2026 and every 30 days thereafter until a determination is made by the District Court. (TMM) [Entered: 03/05/2026 08:48 AM]
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (TMM) [Entered: 03/04/2026 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 3 TEXT ORDER (Clerk) It is the Court's practice to hold sittings in the Virgin Islands twice each year. The parties are hereby advised that this case is tentatively listed for calendaring in Winter 2026. Due to the tentative calendar date, the parties and court reporters are expected to abide by all scheduling orders. Motions for extension of time are strongly disfavored and will not be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. (TMM) [Entered: 03/04/2026 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMM) [Entered: 03/04/2026 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Angel Rodriguez in District Court No. 1:04-cr-00105-003. (TMM) [Entered: 03/04/2026 02:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Angel Rodriguez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Brian Dobbins Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ANGEL RODRIGUEZ | |
| Represented By: | Angel Rodriguez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
