Matthew Meanor v. Warden Beaver County Jail, et al
| MATTHEW STEPHEN MEANOR |
| WARDEN BEAVER COUNTY JAIL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA |
| 26-1536 |
| March 16, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Sarah E. Cobbs on behalf of Appellee(s) District Attorney of Beaver County and Warden of Beaver County Jail. [26-1536] (SEC) [Entered: 04/10/2026 07:58 AM] |
| Filing 5 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Sarah E. Cobbs, Esq. and Alicia Hronek for Appellees Attorney General Pennsylvania, District Attorney Beaver County and Warden Beaver County Jail requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 04/14/2026. (ARR) [Entered: 03/31/2026 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (NAF) [Entered: 03/20/2026 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (ARR) [Entered: 03/16/2026 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (ARR) [Entered: 03/16/2026 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Matthew Stephen Meanor in District Court No. 2:24-cv-01771. (ARR) [Entered: 03/16/2026 03:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
