Kareem Garrett v. Muhammad Naji, et al
| KAREEM GARRETT |
| DEBRA YOUNKIN, Corrections Health Administrator Nurse, JANET PEARSON, Nurse Supervisor, SGT. JAMES, SERGEANT WOOMER, OFFICER HUNT, State Trooper, VINCENT DEFELICE, DR. SHELLA A. KHATRI, DEBORAH CUTSHALL, PHS Administrator, NURSE PRACTITIONER BARNES and DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI |
| 26-1584 |
| March 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Document in Support of the Appeal titled: Third Circuit Appellate Brief Outline and Appendix Checklist filed by Appellant Kareem Garrett. Certificate of Service dated 07/07/2026. Service made by 3rd party, ECF. (DW) [Entered: 07/13/2026 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 17 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Samuel H. Foreman on behalf of Appellee(s) Dr. Muhammad Naji, Deborah Cutshall, Nurse Practitioner Barnes. [26-1584] (SHF) [Entered: 06/01/2026 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 16 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Benjamin M. Lombard on behalf of Appellee(s) Dr. Muhammad Naji, Deborah Cutshall, and Nurse Practitioner Barnes. [26-1584] (BML) [Entered: 06/01/2026 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 15 Documents in Support of Appeal [District Court Documents] filed by Appellant Kareem Garrett. Certificate of Service dated 04/15/2026. Service made by US mail. (ARR) [Entered: 04/16/2026 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 14 Documents in Support of Appeal [Exhibits] filed by Appellant Kareem Garrett. Certificate of Service dated 04/15/2026. Service made by US mail. (ARR) [Entered: 04/16/2026 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 13 Appellant's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. Certificate of Service dated 04/14/2026. Service made by US mail. (ARR) [Entered: 04/16/2026 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 12 Appellant's Rebuttal to Defendants' Motion to Enforce Settlement. Certificate of Service dated 04/14/2026. Service made by US mail. (ARR) [Entered: 04/16/2026 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 11 Appellant's Rebuttal to Jurisdictional Defect Notice [ # 6 ]. Certificate of Service dated 04/14/2026. Service made by US mail. (ARR) [Entered: 04/16/2026 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: RESPONSE filed by Appellee Shella A. Khatri in Support of Dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 04/16/2026 by US mail, ECF. [26-1584]--[Edited 04/16/2026 by ARR] (CLN) [Entered: 04/16/2026 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Kareem Garrett to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal [ # 6 ], Legal Division letter advising of possible summary action [ # 6 ]. Certificate of Service dated 04/12/2026. Service made by hand delivery. (CLW) [Entered: 04/14/2026 09:26 AM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Daniel B. Mullen on behalf of Appellee(s) Janet Pearson; Debra Younkin; Sgt. James; Sgt. Woomer; Officer Hunt; Vincent DeFelice. [26-1584] (DBM) [Entered: 04/03/2026 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 7 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Meghan K. Adkins, Esq. for Appellees Muhammad Naji and Deborah Cutshall, Jorden P. Colalella, Esq. for Appellees Janet Pearson, Deborah Cutshall and James, Samuel H. Foreman, Esq. for Appellees Muhammad Naji, Deborah Cutshall and Barnes and Benjamin M. Lombard, Esq. for Appellees Muhammad Naji, Deborah Cutshall and Barnes requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 04/17/2026. (CLW) [Entered: 04/03/2026 09:10 AM] |
| Filing 6 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect AND advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for possible summary action. (ZM) [Entered: 03/26/2026 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Cassidy L. Neal, Esquire on behalf of Appellee(s) Shella A. Khatri, M.D.. [26-1584] (CLN) [Entered: 03/23/2026 04:25 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER (Clerk) It is noted that one of the District Court orders on appeal and other portions of this case are sealed in the District Court. Because it is sealed, the Clerk has not filed the District Courts order on this Courts docket. Any party who wishes to continue the seal must file a motion pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 106.1(c)(2) within thirty days of the date the notice of appeal was filed or the seal will be lifted and the order will be added to the docket without restriction. Any motion under 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 106.1(c)(2) should specify the scope of the relief requested, including the basis for sealing and the desired duration of the sealing order. If any party intends to file other sealed documents with the Court during the appeal, the filing party must file an appropriate motion to seal, submit the documents separately, and title the filing as SEALED. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 106.1(a). The parties are directed to use the CM/ECF events preceded by the word SEALED whenever filing any documents which may contain sealed material. All hard copies of documents submitted to this Court should be properly labeled that they are SEALED and provided in a clearly marked envelope (CLW) [Entered: 03/20/2026 02:49 PM]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (CLW) [Entered: 03/20/2026 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CLW) [Entered: 03/20/2026 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Kareem Garrett in District Court No. 3:14-cv-00031. (CLW) [Entered: 03/20/2026 01:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
