Courtney Miller v. Eric Miller, et al
| COURTNEY MILLER |
| COUNTY OF LUZERNE and ERIC MILLER |
| 26-1602 |
| March 24, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: NOT PARTICIPATING: Daniel B. Mullen, Esq. for County of Luzerne and Eric Miller will not participate in this appeal, received. [26-1602] (DBM) [Entered: 03/31/2026 04:30 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER (Clerk) No action will be taken on motion to proceed in forma pauperis as it is unnecessary. It is noted that the District Court previously granted Appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (TMM) [Entered: 03/26/2026 11:43 AM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant Courtney Miller for Appointment of Counsel. Service made by the Clerk's Office via CM.ECF on 03/24/2026. (PDB) [Entered: 03/24/2026 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION filed by Appellant Courtney Miller to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (PDB) [Entered: 03/24/2026 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (PDB) [Entered: 03/24/2026 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 03/24/2026 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Courtney Miller in District Court No. 3:25-cv-01454. (PDB) [Entered: 03/24/2026 12:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
