USA v. Ronald Goode
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| RONALD GOODE |
| 26-1657 |
| March 24, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion by Appellant to stay the appeal. The appeal is hereby stayed pending a decision by the United States Supreme Court of the petition for writ of certiorari in Hunter v. United States, Supreme Court No. 24-1063. Upon final disposition by the Supreme Court, Appellant must file a response within seven (7) days advising the Court of which effect, if any, the decision in Hunter has on the pending appeal. Appellant must also file the criminal information statement and transcript purchase order within seven (7) days of the final disposition on Hunter, filed. (AWI) [Entered: 05/07/2026 09:35 AM]
|
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant to stay the appeal pending disposition of Hunter v. United States in the Supreme Court. Certificate of Service dated 04/22/2026. Service made by ECF. [26-1657] --[Edited 04/23/2026 by AWI] (BGS) [Entered: 04/22/2026 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Brett G. Sweitzer on behalf of Appellant(s) Ronald Goode. [26-1657] (BGS) [Entered: 04/22/2026 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 7 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Attorney Jonathan A. McDonald, Esq. for Appellant Mr. Ronald Goode requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 04/22/2026. Information Statement on or before 04/22/2026. Disclosure Statement on or before 04/22/2026. (TMK) [Entered: 04/08/2026 08:52 AM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Robert A. Zauzmer on behalf of Appellee(s) USA. [26-1657] (RAZ) [Entered: 03/30/2026 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (AWI) [Entered: 03/24/2026 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 4 Appendix Citation Notice sent to Jonathan A. McDonald, Esq.. If unable to comply you must respond on or before 04/07/2026. (AWI) [Entered: 03/24/2026 03:36 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) appointing FPD to represent Appellant Mr. Ronald Goode. (AWI) [Entered: 03/24/2026 03:35 PM]
|
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AWI) [Entered: 03/24/2026 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 CRIMINAL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Mr. Ronald Goode in District Court No. 2:22-cr-00044-001. (AWI) [Entered: 03/24/2026 03:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Ronald Goode | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Thomas M. Zaleski Esq. |
| Represented By: | Robert A. Zauzmer Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RONALD GOODE | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan A. McDonald Esq. |
| Represented By: | Brett G. Sweitzer Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
