USA v. Richard Boyle
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| RICHARD BOYLE |
| 26-1658 |
| March 25, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Richard Boyle for Certificate of Appealability. Response due on 04/27/2026. Certificate of Service dated 04/14/2026. Service made by US mail. (CND) [Entered: 04/20/2026 03:46 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion is granted. Appellant's application for a certificate of appealability must be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. If Appellant does not file an application for a certificate of appealability by the deadline established, Appellant's notice of appeal will be deemed to be such an application and will be submitted by the Clerk of this Court to a panel of the Court for consideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)(2). A copy of this order will be sent to Appellant at Phoenix SCI and Philadelphia FDC, as the Federal Bureau of Prisons Inmate Locator does not indicate Mr. Boyle is in federal custody as of the date of this Order. This Order is without prejudice to renewal should Appellant determine that an additional extension of time is necessary due to his transferal. (CND) [Entered: 04/08/2026 08:24 AM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Richard Boyle for Extension of Time to file an Application for Certificate of Appealability. Response due on 04/16/2026. Certificate of Service dated 04/01/2026. Service made by US mail. (CND) [Entered: 04/03/2026 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Robert A. Zauzmer on behalf of Appellee(s) USA. [26-1658] (RAZ) [Entered: 03/30/2026 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (SH) [Entered: 03/30/2026 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION filed by Appellant Richard Boyle for appointment of appellate counsel. Response due on 04/02/2026. Certificate of Service dated 03/20/2026. Service made by US mail. (CND) [Entered: 03/26/2026 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (CND) [Entered: 03/25/2026 11:11 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CND) [Entered: 03/25/2026 11:11 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Richard Boyle in District Court No. 2:17-cr-00197. (CND) [Entered: 03/25/2026 11:06 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Richard Boyle | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Robert J. Livermore Esq. |
| Represented By: | Robert A. Zauzmer Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RICHARD BOYLE | |
| Represented By: | Richard Boyle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
