Santanyo Lewis v. Laurel Harry, et al
| SANTANYO LEWIS |
| LAUREL R. HARRY, Secretary of Corrections, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, Executive secretary of corrections, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN, Deputy secretary of administration, ERICA BENNING, Bureau of health care services director, MICHAEL ZAKEN, Facility manager, MARK DIALESANDRO, Deputy superintendent of centralized services, K. PETTERSON, Business office manager, ROSS SMITH, Corrections healthcare administrator, JENNIFER BEERS, Nurse and AMY CLARK |
| 26-1834 |
| April 17, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Santanyo Lewis, granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Santanyo Lewis. The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order; referring to a motions panel the motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Santanyo Lewis. (JK) [Entered: 08/17/2026 03:08 PM]
|
| Filing 14 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Santanyo Lewis. (JK) [Entered: 08/11/2026 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 13 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Santanyo Lewis. (JK) [Entered: 08/11/2026 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION filed by Appellant Santanyo Lewis to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (JK) [Entered: 08/11/2026 03:37 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER (Clerk) The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is held in abeyance pending submission of additional documents. Appellant must submit a completed copy of this Court's affidavit of poverty. A complete copy of the affidavit of poverty form is hereby transmitted to Appellant. Failure to submit this form within 14 days of the date of this order may result in dismissal of the appeal. (JK) [Entered: 07/23/2026 11:53 AM]
|
| Filing 10 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Santanyo Lewis. (JK) [Entered: 07/17/2026 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 9 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Appellant Santanyo Lewis requesting Prison Account Statement. Compliance due 06/22/2026. (JK) [Entered: 06/08/2026 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 8 LETTER filed by Appellant Santanyo Lewis. (JK) [Entered: 05/18/2026 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Santanyo Lewis for Appointment of Counsel. (JK) [Entered: 05/01/2026 04:38 PM] |
| Filing 6 LETTER filed by Appellant Santanyo Lewis. (JK) [Entered: 05/01/2026 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant Santanyo Lewis to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Originally filed in District Court on 4/28/2026. (JK) [Entered: 04/30/2026 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 4 Copy of duplicate notice of appeal received on 04/16/2026. (JK) [Entered: 04/17/2026 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (JK) [Entered: 04/17/2026 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 04/17/2026 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Santanyo Lewis in District Court No. 2:25-cv-01010. (JK) [Entered: 04/17/2026 02:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
