Damian Bradford v. Shawn Palmer, et al
| DAMIAN BRADFORD |
| TROOPER SHAWN PALMER, POLICE SGT. JOSH GONZALEZ, POLICE OFFICER ANDREW GOLLETTI, CPL. MATEO E. HERRERA, Esq., sued in their individual capacities and LAMARR RAWL, sued in their invidual and official capacity |
| 26-1922 |
| April 21, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER (Clerk) Action on the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is deferred pending the submission of additional documents. Appellant must submit a certified copy of the prison account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the six-month period prior to the filing of the notice of appeal. The account statement must be submitted within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. (SB) [Entered: 06/03/2026 04:39 PM]
|
| Filing 12 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Damian Bradford. (SB) [Entered: 05/28/2026 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 11 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Damian Bradford. (SB) [Entered: 05/28/2026 04:38 PM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION filed by Appellant Damian Bradford to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 06/04/2026. Certificate of Service dated 05/20/2026. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 05/28/2026 04:37 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion for extension of time to file for IFP filed by Appellant Damian Bradford. Appellant must either pay to the district court the entire docketing and filing fee of $605.00 or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, along with an addendum to the affidavit in support of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis , a completed form authorizing assessments to be made from his prison account, and a certified prison account statement within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Should Appellant fail to either pay the fees or file the motion within the time stated, the appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1 without further notice. (SB) [Entered: 05/19/2026 03:11 PM]
|
| Filing 8 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Attorney Steven C. Townsend, Esq. for Appellee Lamarr Rawl requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 06/01/2026. (SB) [Entered: 05/18/2026 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jordan P. Shuber on behalf of Appellee(s) Police Sgt. Josh Gonzalez; Police Officer Andrew Golletti. [26-1922] (JPS) [Entered: 05/18/2026 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Damian Bradford for Enlargement of Time to File for In Forma Pauperis with all other necessary forms. Response due on 05/26/2026. Certificate of Service dated 05/10/2026. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 05/18/2026 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 5 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 04/24/2026 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Kiley M. Verbanac on behalf of Appellee(s) Trooper Shawn Palmer; Cpl. Mateo E. Herrera. [26-1922] (KMV) [Entered: 04/22/2026 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (SB) [Entered: 04/21/2026 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB) [Entered: 04/21/2026 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Damian Bradford in District Court No. 2:24-cv-01024. (SB) [Entered: 04/21/2026 02:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
