Natasha Collins v. SBA
| NATASHA COLLINS |
| U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, (SBA) RESTAURANT REVITALIZATION FUND |
| 26-1950 |
| April 27, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| APA Review/Appeal |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Appellee SBA verbally granted an extension of time to file brief until 07/10/2026 pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 31.4. (TMM) [Entered: 06/22/2026 12:07 PM] |
| Filing 8 PRO SE BRIEF with Appendix attached on behalf of Appellant Natasha Collins. Certificate of Service to parties/counsel by clerks office via CMECF on 05/27/2026 by US mail. (PAR) [Entered: 05/27/2026 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (AMR) [Entered: 05/06/2026 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 6 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Natasha Collins due on or before 06/15/2026. Appendix due on or before 06/15/2026. (AMR) [Entered: 05/06/2026 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Erin E. Lindgren, AUSA on behalf of Appellee(s) US Small Business Administration (SBA). [26-1950] (EEL) [Entered: 05/01/2026 02:23 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER (Clerk) This appeal was transferred from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to this Court. It appears that certain briefs and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis were filed during the Federal Circuit proceedings. Those filings have not been placed on this Courts docket. At the appropriate time, this Court will set a deadline for filing briefs or argument regarding the appeal. The parties must then file appropriate briefs or responses that comply with this Courts rules, procedures, and precedent. Additionally, the IFP motion is unnecessary because the appellant was granted permission to proceed IFP in the district court. (AMR) [Entered: 04/27/2026 04:47 PM]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (AMR) [Entered: 04/27/2026 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 04/27/2026 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Natasha Collins in District Court No. 2:22-cv-04104. (AMR) [Entered: 04/27/2026 04:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Natasha Collins v. SBA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NATASHA COLLINS | |
| Represented By: | Natasha Collins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, (SBA) RESTAURANT REVITALIZATION FUND | |
| Represented By: | Erin E. Lindgren Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
