Deonca Williams v. Citibank NA, et al
Plaintiff: DEONCA WILLIAMS
Defendant: CITIBANK NA, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Trustee Bank and STACEY POINDEXTER, Trustee Indenture
Case Number: 26-2107
Filed: May 13, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2026 Filing 7 ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC PRO SE BRIEF with Appendix attached on behalf of Appellant Deonca Williams. On 7/1/26 4 additional hard copies are being sent to Clerk via UPS and 1 hard copy is being sent to defendants' attorney via UPS. Certificate of Service dated 06/30/2026 by ECF. [Entry edited to reflect the correct event] [26-2107]--[Edited 07/01/2026 by EMA] (DW) [Entered: 06/30/2026 02:17 AM]
May 22, 2026 Filing 6 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (JK) [Entered: 05/22/2026 02:00 AM]
May 22, 2026 Filing 5 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Deonca Williams due on or before 07/01/2026. Appendix due on or before 07/01/2026. (JK) [Entered: 05/22/2026 01:50 AM]
May 21, 2026 Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from William P. Reiley on behalf of Appellee(s) Citibank, N.A., The Bank of New York Mellon and Stacy Poindexter. [26-2107] (WPR) [Entered: 05/21/2026 03:29 PM]
May 13, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (JK) [Entered: 05/13/2026 02:39 AM]
May 13, 2026 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 05/13/2026 02:36 AM]
May 13, 2026 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Deonca Williams in District Court No. 2:25-cv-01044. (JK) [Entered: 05/13/2026 02:24 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Deonca Williams v. Citibank NA, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DEONCA WILLIAMS
Represented By: Deonca Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITIBANK NA
Represented By: William P. Reiley Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Trustee Bank
Represented By: William P. Reiley Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STACEY POINDEXTER, Trustee Indenture
Represented By: William P. Reiley Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?