In re: James Watson

In re: James Watson

Petitioner:	In re: JAMES WATSON
Respondent:	DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRADFORD COUNTY
Case Number:	26-2189
Filed:	May 19, 2026
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
June 8, 2026	Filing 2 ORDER (BIBAS, PHIPPS and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges) The application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2244 to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition is denied. Petitioner does not rely on any new rule of constitutional law in support of his application, and he has not made a prima facie showing that he relies on newly discovered evidence that he was unable to discover[] previously through the exercise of due diligence, and that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that . . . no reasonable factfinder would have found [him] guilty of the underlying offense[s]. 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(2)(B). Panel No.: CLD-138. Phipps, Authoring Judge. (SB) [Entered: 06/08/2026 04:04 PM]
May 19, 2026	Filing 1 Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(b) filed. Notice filed by Petitioner James Watson. (SB) [Entered: 05/19/2026 11:27 AM]

Date Filed

Document Text

June 8, 2026

Filing 2 ORDER (BIBAS, PHIPPS and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges) The application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2244 to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition is denied. Petitioner does not rely on any new rule of constitutional law in support of his application, and he has not made a prima facie showing that he relies on newly discovered evidence that he was unable to discover[] previously through the exercise of due diligence, and that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that . . . no reasonable factfinder would have found [him] guilty of the underlying offense[s]. 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(2)(B). Panel No.: CLD-138. Phipps, Authoring Judge. (SB) [Entered: 06/08/2026 04:04 PM]

May 19, 2026

Filing 1 Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(b) filed. Notice filed by Petitioner James Watson. (SB) [Entered: 05/19/2026 11:27 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: James Watson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: JAMES WATSON
Represented By:	James Watson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRADFORD COUNTY
Represented By:	District Attorney Bradford County
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?