David Barksdale v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
| DAVID LESLIE BARKSDALE |
| SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA |
| 26-2293 |
| May 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Supplement filed by Appellant David Leslie Barksdale in support of appeal. (LMR) [Entered: 06/25/2026 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant David Leslie Barksdale to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 06/09/2026. Service made by US mail. (LMR) [Entered: 06/18/2026 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION filed by Appellant David Leslie Barksdale to exceed the page limit. Certificate of Service dated 06/09/2026. Service made by US mail. (LMR) [Entered: 06/18/2026 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 7 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Susan E. Affronti, Esq., Amanda A. Batz, Esq., and Superintendent Phoenix SCI and Ronald Eisenberg, Esq. for Appellee Attorney General Pennsylvania requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 06/25/2026. (LMR) [Entered: 06/11/2026 09:41 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Appellant was previously advised that the appeal will be submitted for possible dismissal due to a question regarding jurisdiction. The appeal will also be submitted to a panel of this court for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) as to whether the appeal will be dismissed as legally frivolous or whether summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 is appropriate. In making this determination, the district court opinion and record will be examined. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. Appellee need not file a response unless directed to do so. The Court may reconsider in forma pauperis status or request additional information at any time during the course of this appeal. (LMR) [Entered: 06/03/2026 04:08 PM]
|
| Filing 5 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 05/28/2026 01:48 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION filed by Appellant David Leslie Barksdale to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (LMR) [Entered: 05/26/2026 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 05/26/2026 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (LMR) [Entered: 05/26/2026 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant David Leslie Barksdale in District Court No. 3:22-cv-02012. (LMR) [Entered: 05/26/2026 03:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
