Phyo Htut v. Attorney General United States of America
Petitioner: PHYO HEIN HTUT
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 26-2330
Filed: May 27, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2026 Filing 19 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (PDB) [Entered: 07/24/2026 03:43 PM]
July 24, 2026 Filing 18 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Petitioner Phyo Hein Htut due on or before 09/02/2026. Appendix due on or before 09/02/2026. (PDB) [Entered: 07/24/2026 03:41 PM]
July 24, 2026 Filing 17 ECF FILER: ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. [26-2330] (TS) [Entered: 07/24/2026 12:17 PM]
June 26, 2026 Filing 16 TEXT ORDER (Clerk) granting motion by Respondent Attorney General United States of America for extension of time to file certified administrative record until August 5, 2026. If during the course of the extended period for filing the Court determines that the record is needed to resolve pending matter, Respondent will be directed to produce the record. (NMB) [Entered: 06/26/2026 12:13 PM]
June 24, 2026 Filing 15 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Respondent Attorney General United States of America for Extension of Time to file Certified Administrative Record until/for August 5, 2026. Certificate of Service dated 06/24/2026. Service made by ECF. [26-2330] (LMM) [Entered: 06/24/2026 08:43 AM]
June 22, 2026 Filing 14 ECF FILER: Reply by Petitioner Phyo Hein Htut to Response. Certificate of Service dated 06/22/2026. Service made by ECF [26-2330] (NEM) [Entered: 06/22/2026 04:33 PM]
June 15, 2026 Filing 13 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Sayoni Maitra on behalf of Petitioner(s) Phyo Hein HTUT. [26-2330] (SM) [Entered: 06/15/2026 12:09 PM]
June 12, 2026 Filing 12 ECF FILER: Response filed by Respondent Attorney General United States of America to motion. Certificate of Service dated 06/12/2026. [26-2330] (LMM) [Entered: 06/12/2026 02:26 PM]
June 10, 2026 Filing 11 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Phyo Hein Htut. [26-2330] (NEM) [Entered: 06/10/2026 11:25 AM]
June 10, 2026 Filing 10 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Natalie Maust on behalf of Petitioner(s) Phyo Hein Htut. [26-2330] (NEM) [Entered: 06/10/2026 11:20 AM]
June 10, 2026 Filing 9 ECF FILER: AGENCY INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Phyo Hein Htut. [26-2330] (NEM) [Entered: 06/10/2026 11:18 AM]
June 3, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER (Clerk) temporarily granting motion for stay of removal in accordance with the Standing Order of the Court dated August 5, 2015. Removal is stayed until such time as the Court can consider the motion for stay of removal. (PDB) [Entered: 06/03/2026 08:53 AM]
June 2, 2026 Filing 7 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Petitioner Phyo Hein Htut to stay removal. Certificate of Service dated 06/02/2026. Service made by ECF. [26-2330] (NEM) [Entered: 06/02/2026 08:53 PM]
June 2, 2026 Filing 6 ECF FILER: Petition for Review filing fee paid by Natalie Maust, Esq. for Petitioner Phyo Hein HTUT. Fee Amount: $600.00 Receipt Number: A03-69021-456. [26-2330] (NEM) [Entered: 06/02/2026 01:33 PM]
May 28, 2026 Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Lindsay M. Murphy on behalf of Respondent(s) U.S. Attorney General. [26-2330] (LMM) [Entered: 05/28/2026 11:40 AM]
May 28, 2026 Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Spencer Shucard on behalf of Respondent(s) Attorney General. [26-2330] (SS) [Entered: 05/28/2026 08:40 AM]
May 27, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (PDB) [Entered: 05/27/2026 04:56 PM]
May 27, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the administrative record. (PDB) [Entered: 05/27/2026 04:54 PM]
May 27, 2026 Filing 1 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Phyo Hein Htut and Attorney General United States of America. Certificate of Service dated 05/27/2026. Service made by ECF. Petition filed electronically on via ECF on 5/27/26 at 3:11 pm.. (PDB) [Entered: 05/27/2026 04:50 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Phyo Htut v. Attorney General United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: PHYO HEIN HTUT
Represented By: Natalie E. Maust Esq.
Represented By: Sayoni Maitra Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Spencer Shucard Esq.
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Lindsay M. Murphy Esq.
Represented By: Acting Attorney General United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?