Don LaFortune v. Attorney General United States of America
| DON KNIGHTS-LEE KEMBERLY LAFORTUNE |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 26-2404 |
| June 3, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Susan G. Roy on behalf of Petitioner(s) Don Knights-Lee Kemberly LaFortune. [26-2404] (SGR) [Entered: 07/30/2026 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 14 AMENDED ORDER (RESTREPO, PORTER and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Circuit Judges) Petitioner's pro se motion to stay removal to Mexico is granted. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434, 436 (2009). The Government's motion to dismiss the petition for review is referred to a regular sitting merits panel. See 3d Cir. I.O.P. 10.3.5 (2018); 3d Cir. I.O.P. 10.6 (2018). Further consideration of the petition for review is stayed pending a decision by the Court in the consolidated matters of R.C.B. v. Attorney General, C.A. No. 25-2358, Velasquez Banegas v. Attorney General, C.A. No. 25-2415, and Alvarez Gomez v. Attorney General, C.A. No. 25-2424; as well as stayed pending resolution of all claims that afford class-wide relief in D.V.D. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., Civil Action No. 25-10676-BEM (D. Mass.). The Government is directed to file status reports every twenty-one (21) days apprising the Court whether the foregoing stays of the petition for review should be lifted. So long as Petitioner is proceeding pro se, he may, but is not required to, file a response within ten days of any status report filed by the Government. Finally, insofar as the Government requests vacatur of the June 4, 2026 order directing it to file the administrative record, the request is dismissed as moot. Panel No.: DLD-158. RESTREPO, Authoring Judge. (JK) [Entered: 07/16/2026 03:52 PM] |
Filing 13
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion for extension of time to file Certified Administrative Record filed by Respondent Attorney General United States of America with filing as of July 14, 2026. (JK) [Entered: 07/16/2026 11:01 AM]
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER (RESTREPO, PORTER and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Circuit Judges) Petitioner's pro se motion to stay removal to Mexico is granted. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434, 436 (2009). The Government's motion to dismiss the petition for review is referred to a regular sitting merits panel. See 3d Cir. I.O.P. 10.3.5 (2018); 3d Cir. I.O.P. 10.6 (2018). Further consideration of the petition for review is stayed pending a decision by the Court in the consolidated matters of R.C.B. v. Attorney General, C.A. No. 25-2358, Velasquez Banegas v. Attorney General, C.A. No. 25-2415, and Alvarez Gomez v. Attorney General, C.A. No. 25-2424; as well as stayed pending resolution of all claims that afford class-wide relief in D.V.D. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., Civil Action No. 25-10676-BEM (D. Mass.). The Government is directed to file status reports every twenty-one (21) days apprising the Court whether the foregoing stays of the petition for review should be lifted. So long as Petitioner is proceeding pro se, he may, but is not required to, file a response within ten days of any status report filed by the Government. Finally, insofar as the Government requests vacatur of the June 4, 2026 order directing it to file the administrative record, the request is granted to this extent only: The Government need not produce the administrative record until thirty (30) days from the date the afore-described stays of the PFR are lifted. Panel No.: DLD-158. RESTREPO, Authoring Judge. (JK) [Entered: 07/16/2026 10:39 AM]
|
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. [26-2404] (TS) [Entered: 07/14/2026 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Respondent Attorney General United States of America for Extension of Time to file Respondent's Motion For An Extension of Time to File Certified Administrative Record until/for 30 days. Certificate of Service dated 07/13/2026. Service made by US mail. [26-2404] (JA) [Entered: 07/13/2026 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 9 Reply to Response by Petitioner Don Knights-Lee Kemberly LaFortune. (JK) [Entered: 06/25/2026 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Respondent Attorney General United States of America to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction, to dismiss case for untimely filing, to vacate order dated 06/04/2026. Certificate of Service dated 06/09/2026. Service made by US mail. SEND TO MERITS PANEL. [26-2404] --[Edited 07/16/2026 by JK] (JA) [Entered: 06/09/2026 09:56 AM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the administrative record. (JK) [Entered: 06/04/2026 03:37 PM]
|
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Joannabelle M. Aquino on behalf of Respondent(s) Attorney General of the United States of America. [26-2404] (JA) [Entered: 06/04/2026 02:04 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Don Knights-Lee Kemberly LaFortune. (JK) [Entered: 06/04/2026 12:58 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER (Clerk) advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect.. (JK) [Entered: 06/04/2026 12:56 PM]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION filed by Petitioner Don Knights-Lee Kemberly LaFortune to Stay Removal. (JK) [Entered: 06/04/2026 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioner Don Knights-Lee Kemberly LaFortune to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 06/04/2026. Service made by ECF. (JK) [Entered: 06/04/2026 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Don Knights-Lee Kemberly LaFortune. Certificate of Service dated 05/27/2026. Service made by US mail. Petition filed nonelectronically. (JK) [Entered: 06/04/2026 12:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
