Tyrone BentleyIn re: Tyrone Bentley
| In re: TYRONE BENTLEY |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 26-2460 |
| June 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NONCOMPLIANCE (Order) On June 9, 2026, this Court received Petitioners motion under 28 U.S.C. 2244 for an Order Authorizing the District Court to Consider a Second or Successive Application for Relief Under 28 U.S.C. 2255. Additional documents are required for the Court to consider Petitioners motion. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner submit the following documents within 21 days of the date of this order: (1) the new proposed habeas petition; (2) the petition(s) filed in prior habeas action(s) (E.D. Pa. 2:10-cr-00525-001); (3) any magistrate judges report(s) regarding the prior habeas action(s) (E.D. Pa. 2:10-cr-00525-001); and (4) the district court opinion(s) and/or order(s) regarding the prior habeas action(s) (E.D. Pa. 2:10-cr-00525-001). See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 22.5(a). Because the proper documents were not included with the 2244 application, the application is deemed lodged with the Court. It is noted that if Petitioner requires copies of these documents from the District Court, there will be a charge for copy work, payable to the Clerk of the District Court. In addition, any request for copy work must be made directly to appropriate District Court. A copy of these documents must be served on the U.S. Attorney for Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Petitioner must also file a certificate of service with the Clerk of the Court of Appeals demonstrating that these documents have been served. Respondent may file a response within seven days of the filing of Petitioners completed application. The deadlines set forth in this order supersede any other deadlines set in this case. No action will be taken regarding Petitioners application until copies of the above-listed documents are received by the Clerk. Failure to file these documents before the deadline may result in the dismissal of the case. (AMR) [Entered: 06/15/2026 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (AMR) [Entered: 06/15/2026 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(b) filed. Notice filed by Petitioner Tyrone Bentley. Placed in Prison Mail on 05/29/2026. Received in the Court of Appeals on 06/10/2026. (AMR) [Entered: 06/15/2026 10:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Tyrone BentleyIn re: Tyrone Bentley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: TYRONE BENTLEY | |
| Represented By: | Tyrone Bentley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
