In re: Daniel Carter
| In re: DANIEL CARTER |
| DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA |
| 26-2468 |
| June 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 TEXT ORDER (Clerk) granting motion filed by Petitioner Mr. Daniel Carter for extension of time to file documents in support of Section 2244(b) Application until August 3, 2026. (ARR) [Entered: 06/25/2026 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Petitioner Mr. Daniel Carter for Extension of Time to file New proposed habeas petition; the petition(s), recommendations, and opinions filed in prior habeas action(s) (E.D. Pa. Nos. 2:93-cv-04301, 2:00-cv-03886). until/for 30. Certificate of Service dated 06/22/2026. Service made by US mail. [26-2468] (JDJ) [Entered: 06/22/2026 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Linda Caracappa, U.S.D.C. for the E.D.Pa. no. 00-cv-3886 filed by Petitioner Mr. Daniel Carter. Certificate of Service dated 06/16/2026. Service made by ECF. [26-2468] (JDJ) [Entered: 06/16/2026 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (SB) [Entered: 06/12/2026 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Mr. Daniel Carter requesting compliance On June 11, 2026, this Court received Petitioners motion under 28 U.S.C. 2244 for an Order Authorizing the District Court to Consider a Second or Successive Application for Relief Under 28 U.S.C. 2254. Additional documents are required for the Court to consider Petitioners motion. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner submit the following documents within 21 days of the date of this order: the new proposed habeas petition;the petition(s) filed in prior habeas action(s) (E.D. Pa. Nos. 2:93-cv-04301, 2:00-cv-03886); any magistrate judges report(s) regarding the prior habeas action(s) (E.D. Pa. Nos. 2:93-cv-04301, 2:00-cv-03886); and the district court opinion(s) and/or order(s) regarding the prior habeas action(s) (E.D. Pa. Nos. 2:93-cv-04301, 2:00-cv-03886). See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 22.5(a). Because the proper documents were not included with the 2244 application, the application is deemed lodged with the Court. (SB) [Entered: 06/12/2026 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(b) filed. Notice filed by Petitioner Mr. Daniel Carter. (SB) [Entered: 06/12/2026 12:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Daniel Carter | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: DANIEL CARTER | |
| Represented By: | Jason D. Javie Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA | |
| Represented By: | District Attorney Philadelphia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
