Karen Hoover, et al v. Cleo AI Inc.
| KAREN HOOVER, Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, TOM BAKER, Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, JED REIFER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MARK CAVE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, GEOFFREY BRETON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and CEDRIC LENOX, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| CLEO AI INC |
| 26-2483 |
| June 16, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Kevin Abramowicz on behalf of Appellee(s) Mark Cave. [26-2483] (KJA) [Entered: 06/17/2026 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Bruce P. Merenstein on behalf of Appellant(s) Cleo AI Inc.. [26-2483] (BPM) [Entered: 06/16/2026 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Helen Chandler Steiger on behalf of Appellee(s) Mark Cave. [26-2483] (HCS) [Entered: 06/16/2026 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 06/16/2026 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (LMR) [Entered: 06/16/2026 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Cleo AI Inc. in District Court No. 3:23-cv-01067. (LMR) [Entered: 06/16/2026 09:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.