Vincent Sanchez v. Butterworth, et al
| VINCENT JAMES SANCHEZ |
| BUTTERWORTH, Operator, RUSHIN, Operator and UNKNOWN COS NAMES WHILE IN SEGREGATION |
| 26-2613 |
| June 29, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER (Clerk) Appellants seek review of the District Court order entered June 2, 2026. The order on appeal may not be final within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 1291 and may not otherwise be appealable at this time. Compare Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 530 (1985), with Johnson v. Jones, 515 U.S. 304, 319-20 (1995), and Monteiro v. City of Elizabeth, 436 F.3d 397, 405 (3d Cir. 2006); see also Barton v. Curtis, 497 F.3d 331, 336 (3d Cir. 2007); Doe v. Groody, 361 F.3d 232, 237-38 (3d Cir. 2004); In re Montgomery County, 215 F.3d 367, 373-74 (3d Cir. 2000). All parties must file written responses addressing this issue, with a certificate of service attached, within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. (AMR) [Entered: 06/29/2026 11:41 AM]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (AMR) [Entered: 06/29/2026 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 06/29/2026 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Butterworth and Rushin in District Court No. 5:24-cv-06884. (AMR) [Entered: 06/29/2026 11:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
