Aquil Johnson v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
| AQUIL JOHNSON |
| PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, MARK GARMAN, DR. RICHARD ELLERS, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC, MICHELLE FISHER, DR. FERNANDO TEJEDA and JORGE DOMINICS |
| 26-2643 |
| July 6, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER (Clerk) dismissing case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). (JK) [Entered: 07/20/2026 03:52 PM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Aquil Johnson to Dismiss Appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). (JK) [Entered: 07/20/2026 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jacob Frasch on behalf of Appellee(s) Pennsylvania Department of Corrections; John E. Wetzel; Mark Garman; Dr. Richard Ellers; Dr. Fernando Tejeda. [26-2643] (JAF) [Entered: 07/14/2026 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 07/09/2026 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (SB) [Entered: 07/06/2026 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB) [Entered: 07/06/2026 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Aquil Johnson in District Court No. 1:21-cv-00516. (SB) [Entered: 07/06/2026 03:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
