SEC v. Todd Lahr, et al
| U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
| TODD LAHR and THOMAS MEGAS |
| 26-2714 |
| July 13, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Securities, Commodities, Exchange |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: RESPONSE from Attorney Stephen Silverman, Esq. for Appellee SEC SEC's in Support of Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction. Certificate of Service dated 07/22/2026. Service made by ECF. [26-2714] (SS) [Entered: 07/22/2026 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Stephen Silverman on behalf of Appellee(s) Securities and Exchange Commission. [26-2714] (SS) [Entered: 07/22/2026 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notice received from the district court that the docketing and filing fees were paid by the appellant on 07/16/2026. (AMR) [Entered: 07/17/2026 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (ZM) [Entered: 07/15/2026 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (AMR) [Entered: 07/13/2026 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 07/13/2026 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Thomas Megas in District Court No. 5:20-cv-01593. (AMR) [Entered: 07/13/2026 01:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
