USA v. Michael Nixon
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| MICHAEL NIXON |
| 26-2752 |
| July 16, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER appointing Edson A. Bostic, Esq. as CJA counsel to continue to represent Appellant Michael Nixon. (KR) [Entered: 07/16/2026 12:05 PM]
|
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (KR) [Entered: 07/16/2026 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 CRIMINAL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Michael Nixon in District Court No. 2:22-cr-00073-001. (KR) [Entered: 07/16/2026 12:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Michael Nixon | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Lauren E. Stram Esq. |
| Represented By: | Justin Oshana Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MICHAEL NIXON | |
| Represented By: | Edson A. Bostic Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
