In re: Malick-Fardy Traore
Petitioner: In re: MALICK-FARDY B. TRAORE
Respondent: TRANSUNION LLC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, AVANT LLC, GREENSKY LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC, CAPITAL ONE NA and GERALD J. PAPPERT
Case Number: 26-2763
Filed: July 23, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2026 Filing 3 NONCOMPLIANCE ORDER (Clerk) Action on the above-captioned petition for writ of mandamus is hereby deferred. Petitioner did not submit the docketing fee or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") with the mandamus petition. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either remit payment of the $600.00 docketing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit. A form IFP affidavit is enclosed for Petitioner's convenience. Any IFP motion filed by a prisoner must be accompanied by a certified statement of the institutional account for the six months prior to this date. It is noted that a petition for writ of mandamus is an original action and a separate motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must be filed, regardless of Petitioner's fee status in other proceedings. If the docketing fee is not paid or the IFP motion is not filed, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 3.3(a), 107.1(a). Petitioner must also serve the petition on each party to the proceeding in the trial court (or on counsel for each party), and provide a copy of the petition for writ of mandamus to the District Court judge. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(1). In addition, a copy of the IFP motion must be served on each party to the proceeding, to include the District Court judge. A certificate of service reflecting that the petition has been served must be submitted to the Court of Appeals within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. See Fed. R. App. P. 21, 25. The petition will not be submitted to the Court until the docketing fee or IFP motion and the certificate of service are received. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(3). If they are not received by the deadline, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 107.1, 107.2.--[Edited 07/23/2026 by ARR] (ARR) [Entered: 07/23/2026 04:13 PM]
July 23, 2026 Filing 2 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (ARR) [Entered: 07/23/2026 03:52 PM]
July 23, 2026 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner Malick-Fardy B. Traore. (ARR) [Entered: 07/23/2026 03:47 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Malick-Fardy Traore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: MALICK-FARDY B. TRAORE
Represented By: Malick-Fardy B. Traore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TRANSUNION LLC
Represented By: Jayme C. Bronson Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC
Represented By: Stacy A. Orvetz Esq.
Represented By: Eric F. Barton Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: AVANT LLC
Represented By: Jonathon P. Reinisch Esq.
Represented By: Daniel P. Jackson Esq.
Represented By: Joshua D. Hill Esq.
Represented By: Joshua D. Elliott Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: GREENSKY LLC
Represented By: Kevin Cornish Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CAPITAL ONE NA
Represented By: Preston J. Spadaro Esq.
Represented By: Elanor A. Mulhern Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: GERALD J. PAPPERT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?