In re: Gary Rock
| In re: GARY LEE ROCK |
| SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI |
| 26-2814 |
| July 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Gary Lee Rock requesting compliance for 2244[b] Motion Received. Compliance due within 21 days. (LMR) [Entered: 07/23/2026 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(b) filed. Notice filed by Petitioner Gary Lee Rock. Placed in Prison Mail on 07/15/2026. (LMR) [Entered: 07/23/2026 02:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Gary Rock | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: GARY LEE ROCK | |
| Represented By: | Gary Lee Rock |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI | |
| Represented By: | District Attorney Franklin County |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
