Thomas GageIn re: Thomas Gage
| In re: THOMAS I. GAGE |
| BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE, KEITH J. LYNCH, WILLIAM F. WALDRON and MADELINE C. ARLEO |
| 26-2921 |
| August 6, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Mr. Thomas I. Gage requesting Action on the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby deferred. Petitioner did not submit the docketing fee or a motion to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") with the mandamus petition. Within 14 days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either remit payment of the $600.00 docketing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit. Petitioner must also serve the petition on all respondents, including parties to the proceeding in the trial court (or counsel for each party), and provide a copy of the petition to the District Court judge. In addition, a copy of the IFP motion must be served on each party to the proceeding, to include the District Court judge. A certificate of service reflecting that the petition has been served must be submitted to the Court of Appeals within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. The petition will not be submitted to the Court until the docketing fee or IFP motion and the certificate of service are received. If they are not received by the deadline, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. (TMM) [Entered: 08/06/2026 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner Mr. Thomas I. Gage. Received on 7/29/2026.--[Edited 08/06/2026 by TMM] (TMM) [Entered: 08/06/2026 02:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
