Erasmo Zavala Almanza, et al v. Facility Administrator Moshannon Valley Processing, et al
| ERASMO ZAVALA ALMANZA and S. Z.H. |
| FACILITY ADMINISTRATOR MOSHANNON VALLEY PROCESSING CENTER |
| 26-2923 |
| July 29, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from LAURA S. IRWIN on behalf of Appellant(s) FACILITY ADMINISTRATOR MOSHANNON VALLEY PROCESSING CENTER. [26-2923] (LSI) [Entered: 07/30/2026 02:20 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) To facilitate electronic filing for larger groups of parties represented by the same attorney, the first named party in each group will be the designated filer, as follows:For all parties represented by Casey Martinez, Esq., or any other attorney from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of Pennsylvania, the designated filer shall be Facility Administrator Moshannon Valley Processing Center. Counsel is advised that the designated filer is for cm/ecf filing purposes only. Names of all represented parties must be listed on all forms, motions and briefs. Attorneys representing smaller groups of parties must select all individual persons or entities as filers in cm/ecf. (SB) [Entered: 07/29/2026 12:34 PM]
|
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB) [Entered: 07/29/2026 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Facility Administrator Moshannon Valley Processing Center in District Court No. 3:26-cv-00720. (SB) [Entered: 07/29/2026 12:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
