Darwin Diaz Turcios v. Facility Administrator Moshannon Valley Processing, et al
| DARWIN DAVID DIAZ-TURCIOS |
| FACILITY ADMINISTRATOR MOSHANNON VALLEY PROCESSING CENTER, DIRECTOR U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES PHILADELPHIA FIELD OFFICE, SECRETARY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 26-2963 |
| August 4, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from LAURA S. IRWIN on behalf of Appellant(s) Attorney General United States of America, Director U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services Philadelphia Field Office, Facility Administrator Moshannon Valley Processing Center and Secretary U.S. Department of Homeland Security. [26-2963] (LSI) [Entered: 08/06/2026 05:29 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (AMR) [Entered: 08/04/2026 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 08/04/2026 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Attorney General United States of America, Director U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services Philadelphia Field Office, Facility Administrator Moshannon Valley Processing Center and Secretary U.S. Department of Homeland Security in District Court No. 3:25-cv-00083. (AMR) [Entered: 08/04/2026 02:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
