Blanca Mercado-Montecino, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
| BLANCA ESTELA MERCADO-MONTECINO and J. D. A.-M. |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 26-3089 |
| August 17, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Spencer Shucard on behalf of Respondent(s) Todd Blanche, Attorney General US. [26-3089] (SS) [Entered: 08/18/2026 12:57 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER (Clerk) any future filings should be in compliance with Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(5) and 3d Cir. L.A.R. 113.12. (LMR) [Entered: 08/18/2026 12:56 PM]
|
Filing 4
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the administrative record. (LMR) [Entered: 08/18/2026 12:53 PM]
|
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) temporarily granting motion for stay of removal in accordance with the Standing Order of the Court dated August 5, 2015. Removal is stayed until such time as the Court can consider the motion for stay of removal. (LMR) [Entered: 08/18/2026 12:52 PM]
|
| Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioners J. D. A.-M. and Blanca Estela Mercado-Montecino to stay removal. Certificate of Service dated 08/17/2026. Service made by US mail. (LMR) [Entered: 08/18/2026 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by J. D. A.-M. and Blanca Estela Mercado-Montecino. Certificate of Service dated 08/17/2026. Service made by US mail. Petition filed electronically on 8/17/26 at 4:52 pm. Payment made through pay.gov.. Receipt No. A03-69388-76. (LMR) [Entered: 08/18/2026 12:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.