Leandro Vaz de Araujo, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
| LEANDRO VAZ DE ARAUJO, MICHELE SOARES-DE SOUZA and J. S. D.S.-V.N. |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 26-3090 |
| August 17, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER (Clerk) temporarily granting motion for stay of removal in accordance with the Standing Order of the Court dated August 5, 2015. Removal is stayed until such time as the Court can consider the motion for stay of removal. (SB) [Entered: 08/18/2026 04:58 PM]
|
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Petitioners Leandro Vaz de Araujo, Michele Soares-de Souza and J. S. D.S.-V.N. to stay removal. Certificate of Service dated 08/18/2026. Service made by ECF. [26-3090] (MSP) [Entered: 08/18/2026 04:40 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the administrative record. (SB) [Entered: 08/18/2026 03:28 PM]
|
Filing 5
ORDER (Clerk) Action on the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is deferred. The request for leave to supplement the motion with financial affidavits is granted. Within 21 days of the date of this order, each adult Petitioner must sign and submit a fully completed affidavit of poverty. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1). Failure to submit the affidavits may result in dismissal of the petition. (SB) [Entered: 08/18/2026 02:54 PM]
|
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Joannabelle Aquino on behalf of Respondent(s) Attorney General of the United States of America. [26-3090] (JA) [Entered: 08/18/2026 02:41 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 (made applicable by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 25(a)(5)) and Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule 113.12, personal identifier information must be redacted from most filings. These identifiers include Social Security numbers, names of minor children, financial account numbers, dates of birth, and home addresses in criminal cases. Litigants are responsible for redacting documents. This Courts Local Appellate Rules are available at www.ca3.uscourts.gov. Accordingly, this action has been docketed under the initials of the minor Petitioner, rather than Petitioners full name. It is noted that the parent or guardian of the minor child is identified in the case and caption by their full name. If the parent or guardian wishes to be identified by their initials as the minor child is or to proceed under a pseudonym, a motion requesting such relief must be filed with the Court within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. Otherwise, the case will continue under the full name of the parent or guardian. The parties should comply with these privacy rules in any future filings, with the exception of the administrative record. The Clerk will not review each filing for compliance. This order has no impact on any filings in the agency, and the parties should address any issues regarding those filings with the appropriate agency. (SB) [Entered: 08/18/2026 02:40 PM]
|
| Filing 2 Joint Motion by Petitioners for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and for Leave to Supplement with Financial Affidavits. Response due on 08/27/2026. Certificate of Service dated 08/17/2026. Service made by ECF.--[Edited 08/18/2026 by SB] (SB) [Entered: 08/18/2026 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by J. S. D.S.-V.N., Michele Soares-de Souza and Leandro Vaz de Araujo. Certificate of Service dated 08/17/2026. Service made by ECF. Petition filed electronically on 8/17/26 at 6:46 pm. (SB) [Entered: 08/18/2026 02:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.