Phyo Htut v. Secretary U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al
| PHYO HEIN HTUT |
| SECRETARY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, WARDEN MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 26-3092 |
| August 19, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Laura S. Irwin on behalf of Appellant(s) Attorney General United States of America, Field Office Director U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Secretary U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Warden Moshannon Valley Correctional Center. [26-3092] (LSI) [Entered: 08/19/2026 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (JK) [Entered: 08/19/2026 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 08/19/2026 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Attorney General United States of America, Field Office Director U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Secretary U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Warden Moshannon Valley Correctional Center in District Court No. 3:25-cv-00139. (JK) [Entered: 08/19/2026 10:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
